RE: [Sip] Editorial question on MIME example

> >I guess you're saying SIP should have used something like 
> >"Length:" instead of "Content-Length:" to avoid collision 
> >with MIME's self-claimed ownership of all field names that 
> >begin with "Content-"?
> 
> No no.
> 
> I am not talking about the usage of Content-Lenght (or any other
> Content- header) in the SIP part of the message. I was 
> referring to the
> usage of Content-Length in the MIME part of the message body.

Ah - thanks for clarifying.  So you are referring to the second Content-Length
field in the example at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#page-212 -- the
Content-Length field with the value 231.  I agree it shouldn't be in that
example.  Looks like something to add to the Essential Corrections.

-d

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip