Re: [Sip] SIPit 20 survey summary

jh@tutpro.com (Juha Heinanen) Sat, 28 April 2007 09:35 UTC

Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhjLQ-0006AA-Ox; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:35:56 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HhjLO-0006A5-O7 for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:35:54 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhjLO-00069x-EF for sip@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:35:54 -0400
Received: from lohi.tutpro.com ([192.98.100.2] helo=tutpro.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhjLN-00026M-2z for sip@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:35:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tutpro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5D51EC02E; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:35:52 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from tutpro.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tutpro.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g+OSXeMrocRJ; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:35:50 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from taimen (nuclease87.gprs.dnafinland.fi [62.78.108.87]) by tutpro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:35:50 +0300 (EEST)
Received: by taimen (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4DE97AC0ED; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:35:43 +0300 (EEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <17971.5486.819002.96466@tutpro.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:35:42 +0300
To: Jeroen van Bemmel <jbemmel@zonnet.nl>
Subject: Re: [Sip] SIPit 20 survey summary
In-Reply-To: <001401c78976$5f8dc020$0601a8c0@BEMBUSTER>
References: <075001c788fc$9f6a2be0$640fa8c0@cis.neustar.com> <001401c78976$5f8dc020$0601a8c0@BEMBUSTER>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
From: jh@tutpro.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: 'IETF SIP List' <sip@ietf.org>, discussion@sipforum.org, sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu, 'Robert Sparks' <rjsparks@estacado.net>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

Jeroen van Bemmel writes:

 > Especially for the use case of emergency calls, would it not be wise to 
 > select a much more simple approach/syntax, e.g.:
 > Emergency-Location: lat=x; lon=y
 > 
 > So no XML, no mime/multipart, as simple as possible (no complex semantics, 
 > usage-rules etc), something to reduce the barrier of 
 > implementation/deployment, and to reduce the risk for interop issues?

i fully agree with this.  we should follow KISS principle here.  it is
highly unlikely that sip ua vendors will even TRY implement such a
complex protocol.  

another reason why it will not get implemented is that sip uas don't
know where they are located.  gps does not work well indoors and mobile
operators at least here have refused to make public coordinates of their
base stations.

-- juha


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip