RE: [Sip] MESSAGE for rendering

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Kyzivat [mailto:pkyzivat@cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 4:54 PM
> To: Hadriel Kaplan
> Cc: sip@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sip] MESSAGE for rendering
>
> Hadriel,
>
> I am entirely with you if the *intent* of sending the vcard is to render
> it to the user in some human readable way. Its hardly any different from
> sending HTML.
>
> Its much more questionable if the intent is that the vcard be filed in
> the recipients address book without being rendered.
>
> Even so, I think it is an open question whether content-dispositions
> other than "render" are valid with MESSAGE. And if so, which ones?

I guess the question is if "render" is synonymous with "inline", as 3261 sounds like it is?  If so, then I think you're right "render" is wrong.  How is it done in email?  I think content-disposition "attachment" vs. inline.  So yeah, the question is if MESSAGE can handle non-render ones.  (clearly "session" would NOT be valid :)

-hadriel

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip