RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841
"Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 10 January 2008 06:00 UTC
Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1JCqT5-0008SQ-VZ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:00:43 -0500
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1JCqT4-0008SJ-HV
for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:00:42 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCqT4-0008S9-6U
for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:00:42 -0500
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62])
by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCqT3-00025k-HT
for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:00:42 -0500
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
C6CA6211BA; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:00:26 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b06a2bb00000459d-25-4785b47a3a19
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.121])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
98E7D2169A; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:00:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.4]) by
esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:00:26 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:00:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF03FA6BD8@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <004401c8533f$8d197500$bd4a6c6b@sisodomain.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841
Thread-Index: AchTPzYXn2dd8gh6QQaIfqe7ot0ndgADooYw
References: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF03F7A681@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
<038901c852c3$d222b750$bd4a6c6b@sisodomain.com>
<4784D96A.5010104@cisco.com>
<040101c852e3$a627f730$bd4a6c6b@sisodomain.com>
<004401c8533f$8d197500$bd4a6c6b@sisodomain.com>
From: "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Mahesh Anjanappa" <mahesha@samsung.com>,
"Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2008 06:00:26.0251 (UTC)
FILETIME=[186E85B0:01C8534E]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
Cc: sip@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Shouldn't each Contact also contain "alice@atlanta.com"? Also, why do you have ";" at the end of each Contact? Regards, Christer > -----Original Message----- > From: Mahesh Anjanappa [mailto:mahesha@samsung.com] > Sent: 10. tammikuuta 2008 6:16 > To: Paul Kyzivat > Cc: sip@ietf.org; Christer Holmberg > Subject: Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 > > hi Paul, > Sorry there is a mistake in Contact header i > described.Following is what i wanted to: > Contact:sip:alice@atlanta.com; > Contact:audio;duplex=full; > Contact:video;duplex=recieve-only; > > Thanks > Mahesh > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mahesh Anjanappa" <mahesha@samsung.com> > To: "Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat@cisco.com> > Cc: <sip@ietf.org>rg>; "Christer Holmberg" > <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 10:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 > > > > Thanks Paul. > > So would it be right if i have a Contact Headers describing > Duplex Audio & > > one-way Video Capabilities as follows? > > > > Contact:sip:alice@atlanta.com; > > Contact:sip:audio;duplex=full; > > Contact:sip:video;duplex=recieve-only; > > > > NOTE: The Predicate(for above) for which i'm attempting is > > & ( & (sip.audio) (sip.duplex=full) ) > > ( & (sip.video) (sip.duplex=receive-only) ) > > > > regards > > Mahesh > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat@cisco.com> > > To: "Mahesh Anjanappa" <mahesha@samsung.com> > > Cc: "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>om>; > <sip@ietf.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:55 PM > > Subject: Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 > > > > > >> > >> > >> Mahesh Anjanappa wrote: > >>> hi > >>> That is my understanding as well. But if that is the case > then it should > >>> apply to Contact header as well > >>> when describing Capabilities using Feature parameters in > Contact Header. > >>> But i'm not sure if it applies the same way. I had posted > this question > >>> long ago but didnt get any comments on it. > >> > >> The rule forbidding multiple instances of a parameter > applies to all > >> headers, so it applies to Contact. E.g. the following is illegal: > >> > >> Contact:sip:alice@atlanta.com;methods="INVITE";methods="CANCEL" > >> > >> Paul > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- [Sip] Re: Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- [Sip] RE: Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] Question on Accept ABNF Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 - matching of list… Christer Holmberg