Re: [Sip] Event Lists: Back-End Credentials

Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@cisco.com> Thu, 11 November 2004 16:14 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA26936 for <sip-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:14:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSHbt-0005pg-9Y for sip-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:15:45 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CSHVo-0007T4-Sy; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:09:28 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CSHPA-0006CT-AL for sip@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:02:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25902 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:02:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSHQK-0005ZD-9W for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:03:50 -0500
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2004 08:16:08 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from mira-sjc5-d.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-d.cisco.com [171.71.163.28]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iABG1wom012857; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:01:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.135.140] (sjc-vpn4-736.cisco.com [10.21.82.224]) by mira-sjc5-d.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id AFR25164; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <41938CF6.60008@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:01:58 -0500
From: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] Event Lists: Back-End Credentials
References: <5816828233DEFA41807A6CFDFDF2343C3A8BD7@esebe056.ntc.nokia.com> <418101FF.9030506@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <418101FF.9030506@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sip@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Its worth noting that this issue has come up in the context of 3gpp, 
where it is actually even harder of a problem than it is here. I suggest 
  folks read section 12.1 of RFC 3725.

Basically, what is says is that delegation is a hard problem, we don't 
have a solution for it. So, in the interim, the 3pcc controller set the 
 From in a specific way in order to be usable in applications which 
(perhaps sadly) don't authenticate. And that's it.

I'm not sure if precedent of past acceptability of this kind of 
statement can help us, but at least there is a precedent.

-Jonathan R.



Adam Roach wrote:

> hisham.khartabil@nokia.com wrote:
> 
>>
>>> A consequence of this is that, lacking any other mechanism, the 
>>> resources in a resource list for which the RLS is not authoritative 
>>> will contain only the information that their notifier is willing to 
>>> reveal to the RLS -- which is generally the same information they 
>>> would render to unauthenticated users. In some cases, this might 
>>> result in no useful information being transferred.
>>>   
>>
>>
>> This limitation by itself kills the idea, IMO. Most presence lists 
>> will rely on the event list, and if its gonna mean that no useful 
>> information will come to the watcher, then the whole mecahnism is 
>> useless.
>>  
>>
> 
> That's a bit of a strong characterization, and it seems to ignore the 
> remainder of the mail that I sent out; specifically:
> 
>   1. Users have the ability to subscribe to any resources that the RLS
>      marks itself as non-authoritative, and
>   2. (More Importantly) Provisions for delegation of authority are
>      included -- they're just not in-scope for this document.
> 
> /a
> 

-- 
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                   600 Lanidex Plaza
Director, Service Provider VoIP Architecture   Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
Cisco Systems
jdrosen@cisco.com                              FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                         PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.cisco.com

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip