Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses
ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk> Tue, 27 November 2007 16:04 UTC
Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix2vX-0002mK-Eh; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:04:47 -0500
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix2vV-0002m8-Nz for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:04:45 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix2vV-0002lz-Dk for sip@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:04:45 -0500
Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.96]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ix2vV-0007NV-2j for sip@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:04:45 -0500
Received: from OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HrqN1Y0090cZkys0501n00; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:04:44 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.120] ([69.250.217.141]) by OMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Hs4k1Y00833dvnH0300000; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:04:44 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=j2sJoBdzzCDz_eK3kPAA:9 a=WG0yntsa8VNs3pzxUoIA:7 a=GgrNABb6MPYRS5opdjXOvcPSp_IA:4 a=Mz_smNXqyOQA:10
Message-Id: <B1428F6F-3BD5-49B4-8475-47C31399D531@g11.org.uk>
From: ken carlberg <carlberg@g11.org.uk>
To: Janet Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Subject: Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:04:44 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc: sip@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Janet, sorry for the tardy comments on the thread. when I read the draft, a couple of other use cases outside of the GETS model came to mind that would seem to prompt a need for an R-P header in a SIP response. In the land mobile radio arena, we have bridging architectures/ technologies like the ISSI that use SIP as a foundation to bridge autonomous subnets of P25 systems. These tend to be resource constrained systems of multi-level precedence, and so having a corresponding R-P header in SIP responses would fold in nicely with what is being built today and planned for the near future. outside of that, there are also some efforts to bridge ISSI with Push- to-talk over Cellular (PoC) with SIP, though this is quite preliminary so I don't know if I'd list this as another use case. But in any event, I think it would be helpful if you could broaden the problem statement in your draft so that it is not strictly focused to just GETS. Subsequent to this broader statement, you could then provide a more in-depth discussion of the GETS *example*. also, is it your plan to progress your draft in the SIPPING WG given that it deals with a requirement? I see its on the SIP agenda along with James' related draft, which is helpful, but I assume that further progress would be shifted to SIPPING. -ken _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses ken carlberg
- [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses Sandesara, Niranjan B
- Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses Jeroen van Bemmel
- RE: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses DOLLY, MARTIN C, ATTLABS
- Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses Jeroen van Bemmel
- RE: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses Joel M. Halpern
- RE: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses Sandesara, Niranjan B
- Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses Janet P Gunn
- Re: [Sip] Need for RPH in SIP Responses ken carlberg