Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite
David R Oran <oran@cisco.com> Tue, 16 November 2004 18:56 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA29391 for <sip-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:56:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU8Wz-0004qH-AP for sip-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:58:22 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU8Ml-00068q-Mg; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:47:47 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU89Q-0003xF-BQ for sip@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:34:00 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA27814 for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:33:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU8Bf-0004L8-KF for sip@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:36:19 -0500
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (171.68.223.138) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2004 10:33:36 -0800
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from imail.cisco.com (imail.cisco.com [128.107.200.91]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id iAGIXQVx029210 for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.32.245.156] (stealth-10-32-245-156.cisco.com [10.32.245.156]) by imail.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with SMTP id iAGIXmw4010544 for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:33:48 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <BDBF7902.1A871%fluffy@cisco.com>
References: <BDBF7902.1A871%fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <FE5FEF81-37FD-11D9-AD99-000A95C73842@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: David R Oran <oran@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:33:21 -0500
To: sip <sip@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
IIM-SIG: v:"1"; h:"imail.cisco.com"; d:"cisco.com"; z:"home"; m:"krs"; t:"1100630029.305808"; x:"432200"; a:"rsa-sha1"; b:"nofws:2362"; e:"Iw=="; n:"sQYarK2E51MdcTiUqeif3F7cWdxIfoCiXhdfb9vD5ee/j0jXL15gbFxF2pXIw" "eAblu0N6XAgK7k+wrbr7bQDJaCDqOmzqpRUBjIRQAXQ7NzadpmR3pUL6wxaRU" "tW+c43sl9jC50Qg1sXHpPjt8Y+Y16ioyQAQAdSunM4YhevURc="; s:"bQPaq80oQFjqTRjGRg659T1MgFu4ocYutGn1d6NaRF//ZeXL7r2IxMAKQ/NU4" "2aA9yZaHAcmXnqEbnLBlhEf/5xVUkIWMCoSgJgSHPWwnQvJz2O6xgTmeFnSad" "AXBhJM8fyfh/fcHhDwJ6QHzou2MRWpH8okkkQ+Dsl6kV0sy5M="; c:"From: David R Oran <oran@cisco.com>"; c:"Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite"; c:"Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:33:21 -0500"
IIM-VERIFY: s:"y"; v:"y"; r:"60"; h:"imail.cisco.com"; c:"message from imail.cisco.com verified; "
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f60d0f7806b0c40781eee6b9cd0b2135
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have a strong preference for (1). I intensely dislike accumulated hacks and entropy in a protocol. Backward compatibility is an important property, but 2543 compatibility is fast becoming a a concrete block chained to our legs. We should declare a day that 2543 SIP implementations don't have to work right any more. I suggest we make that when 3261 goes to draft standard. We can couple that to decreasing entropy in another way - don't make more entropic stuff proposed standard until SIP itself gets to draft. Then we'll see what existing junk gets pulled from SIP because nobody implements it and be moving forward from a stable common base. Donning flame-retardant BVDs... Dave. On Nov 16, 2004, at 12:29 PM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > On 11/16/04 12:05 AM, "Jonathan Rosenberg" <jdrosen@cisco.com> wrote: > >> The solution, which rfc3261 warns of, is that a UA has to put its >> actual >> identity in the From field URI, not what it saw in the To field of the >> original request. This will break all compatibility with rfc2543, but >> will work with other rfc3261 compliant endpoints, since the URI is no >> longer used for dialog identification. > > At this point, I really see two paths forward for the connected party > problem. > > 1) We do as suggested above and allow everything in the From and To > other > than the tags to be changed in a Re-INVITE or UPDATE. > > 2) We create a new thing that is like invite with replaces but add a > new tag > that is called say "subsumes". So if A and B have a dialog, or early > dialog, > and one of them wants to change a From. The UA sends an INVITE for a > new > dialog, indicates it replaces the old dialog, and indicates that it > subsumes > it. The subsumes flag would mean that any existing media session, qos > reservations, etc did not change and got moved to the new dialog. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > David R. Oran Cisco Fellow Cisco Systems 7 Ladyslipper Lane Acton, MA 01720 USA Tel: +1 978 264 2048 Email: oran@cisco.com _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] Identity after reinvite Paul Kyzivat
- [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Jonathan Rosenberg
- [Sip] Re: Identity after reinvite Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite David R Oran
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Peterson, Jon
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Sip] RE: Identity after reinvite Dean Willis