IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Tue, 27 April 2010 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3270F3A69DF for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.479, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RBAKM+0zG5b5 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF1E3A6AE4 for <sip@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-63.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o3RDLhrs016939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:21:44 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (Knoppix-135185238233.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.233]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o3RDLhfg014125; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:21:43 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4BD6E52E.4030903@bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:22:54 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
References: <20100305233033.8662628C400@core3.amsl.com> <4B919F23.7030502@cisco.com> <4BD60D89.3070902@bell-labs.com> <4BD61B92.8080708@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BD61B92.8080708@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: SIP IETF <sip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix (Essential correction for IPv6 ABNF and URI comparison in RFC3261) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:24:06 -0000

On 04/26/2010 06:02 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I also don't feel *strongly* about it. Lets see if anybody else has
> something to say about it.

OK.  Thanks.

For other folks still monitoring the sip list, if you think that
draft-ietf-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix should explicitly spell out that
port number comparison should be done on binary equivalency and
not textual equivalency, please let me know.

IESG last call is over on the draft, and I am trying to
wrap it up.  So please get back to me at your earliest
convenience.  I will revise and resubmit a new version next
week.

Thank you,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email