Re: [Sip] SIP Uri including user=phone parameter
"Rockson Li (zhengyli)" <zhengyli@cisco.com> Wed, 10 March 2010 04:02 UTC
Return-Path: <zhengyli@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7E5D23A6B30 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>;
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:02:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6,
MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YSu5N2syktxK for
<sip@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC063A681A for <sip@ietf.org>;
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com;
dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAP+olktAaHte/2dsb2JhbACDC5cYYnOjE4gnkFWED2oEgxU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.49,612,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";
a="98005853"
Received: from hkg-core-1.cisco.com ([64.104.123.94]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2010 04:02:26 +0000
Received: from xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com (xbh-hkg-412.cisco.com
[64.104.123.69]) by hkg-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
o2A41Nmb023474; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:02:25 GMT
Received: from xmb-hkg-41d.cisco.com ([64.104.123.118]) by
xbh-hkg-412.apac.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:02:22 +0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC006.7C05865E"
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:02:21 +0800
Message-ID: <20E6EBAA15F9AC418B64BC8DD8C602545E5B63@XMB-HKG-41D.cisco.com>
In-reply-to: <8d6bbed81003091950p63641821g7d4526b3772d8308@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] SIP Uri including user=phone parameter
Thread-Index: AcrABd4zrHbghPn1SPaVA2HKAunVLQAAFPCA
References: <8d6bbed81003091950p63641821g7d4526b3772d8308@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Rockson Li (zhengyli)" <zhengyli@cisco.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?5p2o6L+Q5YuH?= <yyong.yang@gmail.com>, <sip@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2010 04:02:22.0142 (UTC)
FILETIME=[7C4FC5E0:01CAC006]
Subject: Re: [Sip] SIP Uri including user=phone parameter
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:02:23 -0000
Kevin, The two are equivalent per sec 19 of RFC3261 <snip> The ordering of parameters and header fields is not significant in comparing SIP and SIPS URIs. </snip> -Rockson ________________________________ From: sip-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sip-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 杨运勇 Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:51 AM To: sip@ietf.org Subject: [Sip] SIP Uri including user=phone parameter Hi all, � I have a question about Sip Uri including user=phone parameter. � whether � sip:+8869812778@lab.com <mailto:sip%3A%2B8869812778@lab.com> ;user=phone;cause=302 � equals to � sip:+8869812778@lab.com;cause=302;user=phone � � Thanks in advance. � Kevin
- [Sip] SIP Uri including user=phone parameter 杨运勇
- Re: [Sip] SIP Uri including user=phone parameter Rockson Li (zhengyli)