[Sip] Sent 18x with 'require:100rel' but no PRACK recieved

" etherchen " <etherchen@foxmail.com> Fri, 19 August 2011 03:17 UTC

Return-Path: <etherchen@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC7721F85A3 for <sip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.706
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN=1.495, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=1.456, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s-vc82boV3iZ for <sip@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbg55.qq.com (smtpbg55.qq.com [64.71.138.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CED7521F8549 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:16:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qq.com; s=s0907; t=1313723861; bh=vrejZMxW8BCHHvkD0s9EjPJ2QYvxuWgoADctxE3Y+Qo=; h=X-QQ-SSF:X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN:X-QQ-DNTY:X-Originating-IP: X-QQ-STYLE:X-QQ-mid:From:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:X-Priority:Message-ID:X-QQ-MIME: X-Mailer:X-QQ-Mailer; b=WdFN4aAZIrtEEhjWKBIA4iRKvjrKHTnfGXOx4klnYrbibq8nKA2BF+NW7HaYalhlO C9SDyRYHH+XblN/xXnh8Z4HXKiPlwnnvxLX1I8j9HcBzQqY/noXt9ydzRHNdJYp
X-QQ-SSF: 0000000000000000000000000000000
X-QQ-BUSINESS-ORIGIN: 2
X-QQ-DNTY: 1
X-Originating-IP: 113.10.147.177
X-QQ-STYLE:
X-QQ-mid: webmail488t1313723859t2907774
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?ZXRoZXJjaGVu?=" <etherchen@foxmail.com>
To: "=?ISO-8859-1?B?c2lw?=" <sip@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_4E4DD5D3_DEF9E110_1202BC5E"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:17:39 +0800
X-Priority: 3
Message-ID: <tencent_1E4799066035BA457D8DBD17@qq.com>
X-QQ-MIME: TCMime 1.0 by Tencent
X-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
X-QQ-Mailer: QQMail 2.x
Subject: [Sip] Sent 18x with 'require:100rel' but no PRACK recieved
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:17:13 -0000

Hi:
  
   I'm facing a ISUP - SIP interworking issue recently.  
  
  I receive INVITE from remote SIP server and send IAM to ISUP side, ISUP reply ACM/CPG and then I send 18x with 100rel out, but I did not receive any PRACK from remote SIP server, and I re-send 18x to them. During this period, ISUP side send ANM to me. 
  
  If connect the call, but my end haven't receive PRACK yet, it become a unreliable call.
  If disconnect the call, I should not base on ANM to release a call.
  If continue 18x re-transmission untill time-out, it will have charging issue. Because ISUP side start billing base on ANM already, but my SIP side haven't start charging because not answer.
  
  Thanks.