[Sip] Table2/3 maintenance (was Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910))

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 02 August 2011 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F76221F85E3; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.45
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yswXV2JGN1mn; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B54321F85CA; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (pool-173-71-50-10.dllstx.fios.verizon.net []) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p72Imn7v097638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:48:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfmmZxEUf9+cnGWK4+GcAuFhq95aviPYxu=kC3r5f4wZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:48:49 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6D2BA7C8-DD7F-444B-8E4A-16D6B3C43212@nostrum.com>
References: <20110802145359.C9DEE98C50D@rfc-editor.org> <DC49588FF3643F43B3A2A8F6F0A625F0284638642A@mailbox1.acmepacket.com> <CALiegfmmZxEUf9+cnGWK4+GcAuFhq95aviPYxu=kC3r5f4wZZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?I=F1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Bob Penfield <BPenfield@acmepacket.com>, jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com, schooler@research.att.com, rsparks@dynamicsoft.com, "sip@ietf.org List" <sip@ietf.org>, schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu, "SIPCORE \(Session Initiation Protocol Core\) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>, Keith Drage <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, alan.johnston@wcom.com, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, mjh@icir.org, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.com>, Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: [Sip] Table2/3 maintenance (was Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3261 (2910))
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "SIPCORE \(Session Initiation Protocol Core\) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:50:19 -0000

(removing the RFC Editor, and setting reply-to to the sipcore list)

Some thing to think about when considering errata on the existing Tables 2 and 3 in RFC3261:

We have had many conversations about the utility of maintaining tables 2 and 3.
I think the most recent was around the Anaheim meeting - see the notes at:

We had strong support for not continuing to add information to Tables 2 and 3, but not
to remove the existing tables from the document.  Maintaining the existing table is
probably a separate question, but keep the arguments noted in the minutes above in
mind when choosing to do so.


On Aug 2, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:

> 2011/8/2 Bob Penfield <BPenfield@acmepacket.com>om>:
>> The entry in the table should be "c" (not "m"). A Contact is not required in a 100 Trying response. The Contact is only required for a 1xx that creates a dialog.
> Right.
> -- 
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>