[Sip] Question on Accept ABNF
"Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 09 January 2008 19:34 UTC
Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1JCggt-0006jQ-4P; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:34:19 -0500
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1JCggr-0006Ys-A3
for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:34:17 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org)
by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCggq-0006Ws-Vn
for sip@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:34:16 -0500
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se ([193.180.251.62])
by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCggq-0000N2-Cr
for sip@ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:34:16 -0500
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
A6D5D21184; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:34:15 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-b0ea3bb00000459d-8c-478521b720a2
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.123])
by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id
83E602009A; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:34:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.200.4]) by
esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:34:15 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 20:34:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DFEE0944@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Question on Accept ABNF
Thread-Index: AchSzBq1jJI0SVz/Ts2YtJ3bh1GVwAAIiICwAAGQ2r4=
References: <CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DF03F7A681@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se><4784D875.7080508@cisco.com>
<CA9998CD4A020D418654FCDEF4E707DFEE0940@esealmw113.eemea.ericsson.se>
From: "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat@cisco.com>,
<sip@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2008 19:34:15.0381 (UTC)
FILETIME=[9E72B850:01C852F6]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Cc:
Subject: [Sip] Question on Accept ABNF
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, I appologize if the following issue has already been dealt with. In RFC3261 the ABNF for the Accept header is the following: Accept = "Accept" HCOLON[ accept-range *(COMMA accept-range) ] accept-range = media-range *(SEMI accept-param) media-range = ( "*/*" / ( m-type SLASH "*" ) / ( m-type SLASH m-subtype )) *( SEMI m-parameter ) accept-param = ("q" EQUAL qvalue) / generic-param qvalue = ( "0" [ "." 0*3DIGIT ] ) / ( "1" [ "." 0*3("0") ] ) generic-param = token [ EQUAL gen-value ] gen-value = token / host / quoted-string ... m-parameter = m-attribute EQUAL m-value m-attribute = token m-value = token / quoted-string Now, when I receive: Accept: xxxx/yyyy;myParam=isThis ...how does my parser know whether "myParam" is a m-parameter, or an accept-param? In RFC2616 (HTTP) it is solved by specifying that the first accept-param MUST be a "q" value, so unless you also have a "q" m-parameter you know that anything that comes before "q" is m-parameter, and the rest (including "q" is accept-param): accept-params = ";" "q" "=" qvalue *( accept-extension ) RFC2616 also says: "Each media-range MAY be followed by one or more accept-params, beginning with the "q" parameter for indicating a relative quality factor. The first "q" parameter (if any) separates the media-range parameter(s) from the accept-params." ...and: "Note: Use of the "q" parameter name to separate media type parameters from Accept extension parameters is due to historical practice. Although this prevents any media type parameter named "q" from being used with a media range, such an event is believed to be unlikely given the lack of any "q" parameters in the IANA media type registry and the rare usage of any media type parameters in Accept. Future media types are discouraged from registering any parameter named "q"." Now, RFC3261 DOES say that Accept follows the syntax defined in RFC2616, but then it is confusing that the 3261 Accept ABNF is not identical. Regards, Christer _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- [Sip] Re: Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- [Sip] RE: Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] Question on Accept ABNF Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Mahesh Anjanappa
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 Christer Holmberg
- [Sip] Question on RFC3840/3841 - matching of list… Christer Holmberg