Re: [Sip] MESSAGE for rendering

Not that I like responding to my incoherent posts, but this one totally 
failed to make sense. I've got to stop posting after midnight and before 
noon.

Dean Willis mumbled:
> 
> On Dec 19, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> 
>>
>> Do you think its ok for the message to contain html?
>>
> 
> That's actually debatable.
> 
> HTML at least has relatively standard "rendering"  -- XML, especially  
> in the absence of some kind of style sheet, doesn't.
> 
>> If you rendered html text directly it would also confuse your mom.
> 
> 
> True. It would be nice to make sue her UA supports HTML before  sending 

That's "make sure her UA supports HTML before sending it" . . .

> it to her, wouldn't it?
> 
> But at least here (this use of MESSAGE) we have an existing way to  say 
> "I don't support that MIME type in a render-to-user context",  which may 
> be adequate. That does put is in a better position than we  were with INFO.

That should have read  "does put us in a batter position than we were 
with INFO".

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip