Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mline"
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Wed, 01 September 2010 22:35 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 813093A6849 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxBJja6OhB6F for
<sip@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E383A69CE for <sip@ietf.org>;
Wed, 1 Sep 2010 15:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com;
dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,306,1280707200"; d="scan'208";a="154314725"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2010 22:35:44 +0000
Received: from [161.44.174.142] (dhcp-161-44-174-142.cisco.com
[161.44.174.142]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
o81MZi0i019631; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:35:44 GMT
Message-ID: <4C7ED540.8050309@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 18:35:44 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikg9wcC0Q3hyc3g6h1rJoQfPrEFd=VJc_NCoNCV@mail.gmail.com> <003901cb49f7$42769ad0$1ede1eac@cisco.com>
<AANLkTikyrqTN5TC=R=aUn3vT0gcgX3g8eMO86Tp0JKJe@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikyrqTN5TC=R=aUn3vT0gcgX3g8eMO86Tp0JKJe@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sameer Sawhney <ssawhney@cisco.com>, paulej@packetizer.com, sip@ietf.org,
sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mline"
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:35:24 -0000
Nitin Kapoor wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > I checked the RFC and noticed that it does not limit the codec #s in mline, > but nor does it comment on infinite number of codecs support being > mandatory. > > So could you please let me know whether it is mandatory to support them or > not. Because if my SBC is not supporting this then i cannot go and ask them > to support this. Well, the number is far from infinite. There are only 128 possible payload types, so you shouldn't see more than that many values. Since there is a reasonable upper bound, it shouldn't be so hard to support. The device that sent you this clearly thought it was something they were prepared to deal with. You can refuse the ones you don't like, so what is the problem? Thanks, Paul > Thanks, > Nitin Kapoor > > > > On 1 September 2010 13:00, Sameer Sawhney <ssawhney@cisco.com> wrote: > >> As per spec 2327 this is valid ! check fmt. >> >> >> media-field = "m=" media space port ["/" integer] >> space proto 1*(space fmt) CRLF >> >> media = 1*(alpha-numeric) >> ;typically "audio", "video", "application" >> ;or "data" >> >> fmt = 1*(alpha-numeric) >> ;typically an RTP payload type for audio >> ;and video media >> >> proto = 1*(alpha-numeric) >> ;typically "RTP/AVP" or "udp" for IP4 >> >> port = 1*(DIGIT) >> ;should in the range "1024" to "65535" inclusive >> ;for UDP based media >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu >> [mailto:sip-implementors-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Nitin >> Kapoor >> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:21 PM >> To: sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu; sip@ietf.org >> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mline" >> >> Dear All, >> >> I am facing the problem where one of source is sending bunch of RTP payload >> in "mline", and because of that my MSX is stripping 2 codec from that line, >> when its forwarding that OFFER to termination end. >> >> This is the "mline" which i am getting from source: >> >> *m=audio 6300 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 35 36 2 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4 80 3 >> 56 >> 118 101 13 120* >> >> This is what my MSX is sending to termination after stripping the payload >> from "mline" >> >> *m=audio 6300 RTP/AVP 18 0 8 35 36 2 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 4 80 3 >> 56 >> 118 101 * >> >> Now i checked some documents but unable to find anything which says its >> correct or not. >> >> Could any one please give some direction on this whether such amount of >> payload type is correct in "mline" or it not acceptable . >> >> Thanks, >> Nitin Kapoor >> _______________________________________________ >> Sip-implementors mailing list >> Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu >> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > Sip-implementors@lists.cs.columbia.edu > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors >
- [Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mline" Nitin Kapoor
- Re: [Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mlin… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of R… Nitin Kapoor
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of R… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Infinite Number of R… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Sip] Infinite Number of RTP payload in "mlin… Worley, Dale R (Dale)