Re: [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 03 June 2010 17:06 UTC
Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 6409028C0F6 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=0.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74,
FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mRDrGC96f6uy for
<sip@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com
[74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB9728C0EF for
<sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:06:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so168192pvf.31 for <sip@ietf.org>;
Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.196.21 with SMTP id t21mr7012243wff.237.1275584776082;
Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.252.19 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <345A3596DB43194797927F6ADFBFFFEF02619B6D65@EX41.exchserver.com>
References: <345A3596DB43194797927F6ADFBFFFEF02619B68F9@EX41.exchserver.com>
<AANLkTinfWCU9mpXsZi7g0DCyO3KEQL44vzXGTdtzKpNR@mail.gmail.com>
<345A3596DB43194797927F6ADFBFFFEF02619B6D46@EX41.exchserver.com>
<AANLkTim9Ed6GTfUwZ2631AhE84E0Sq_0C2ltOF-7XLfJ@mail.gmail.com>
<345A3596DB43194797927F6ADFBFFFEF02619B6D65@EX41.exchserver.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 19:06:15 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTil23KC9iANZNWNhJFm6t5YcWssYoeG5L86zflPR@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
To: Moloud Mousavi <moloud@blueslice.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "sip@ietf.org" <sip@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:06:36 -0000
2010/6/3 Moloud Mousavi <moloud@blueslice.com>om>: > Regarding your question, please read RFC 3261. nonce and cnonce must not be equal. Period. > By the way, as I understood, there is a moderator here. Probably he/she knows what should be forwarded or not. There is no moderator inspecting each mail before allowing it to be published or not. For questions/doubts related to SIP protocol the sip-implementors maillist is the appropriate place. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261 Moloud Mousavi
- Re: [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261 Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261 Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261 Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261 Tom Taylor
- Re: [Sip] cnonce in RFC 3261 James M. Polk