RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06
"DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 30 January 2008 19:19 UTC
Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKISd-0001Lr-A5; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:19:03 -0500
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JKISb-0001Lm-G6 for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:19:01 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKISb-0001Le-4e for sip@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:19:01 -0500
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com ([135.245.0.37]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JKISa-0005W7-Al for sip@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:19:00 -0500
Received: from ilexp02.ndc.lucent.com (h135-3-39-2.lucent.com [135.3.39.2]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id m0UJIimM003624; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:18:52 -0600 (CST)
Received: from DEEXP01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.65]) by ilexp02.ndc.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:18:36 -0600
Received: from DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com ([135.248.187.20]) by DEEXP01.de.lucent.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:18:34 +0100
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:18:33 +0100
Message-ID: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE2918001BB7CE2@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180019F7594@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06
Thread-index: Acg5CAVYvVaurdFmT0G+mU6ExOtR0AqbKTcw
References: <5D1A7985295922448D5550C94DE29180019F7594@DEEXC1U01.de.lucent.com>
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, sip@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2008 19:18:34.0228 (UTC) FILETIME=[E826EB40:01C86374]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bdc523f9a54890b8a30dd6fd53d5d024
Cc: slawrence@bluesocket.com, alan.ietf@polyphase.ca
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org
(As WG chair) There were no comments in response to this WGLC, so I propose to submit a publish request for it shortly. If it is still on your pending list to look at, then immediately would be a good time to get round to it. Regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@alcatel-lucent.com] > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 7:33 PM > To: sip@ietf.org > Cc: alan.ietf@polyphase.ca; slawrence@bluesocket.com > Subject: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06 > > (As WG chair) > > This document has a somewhat complicated history, in that we > completed it once in the WG and sent it to the IESG, but it > came back from them because of concerns over security issues. > > The editor's have now followed the instructions from the > previous meeting, i.e. to: > > Integrated Max-Breadth based on working group discussion of the > secdir review > > Added a paragraph pointing out that removing or modifying other > node's branch parameters defeats their ability to loop detect > > Moved the total number of messages from O(2^70) to O(2^71) based > on an observation by Jan Kolomaznik. To see this, note that the > total number of requests is the sum from i=0 to Max-Forwards of > 2^i which is 2^(Max-Forwards+1) - 1. The point of the text > doesn't change - (the point being that the number is _big_). > > Made the new 4xx concrete (choosing 440) > > Added a sentence reinforcing that if you forward to only one > branch, you still potentially have a constant multiplier of > messages in the network as Max-Forwards runs out (based on > feedback from Thomas Cross.) > > These changes are significant enough to justify a revised > WGLC, and I would therefore like the working group to review > the document and provide comments to the SIP list and authors by > > Friday 21st December 2007. > > It would be appropriate to concentrate on the text with the > changes identified about. > > The document may be found at: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-f > ix-06.txt > > And the wdiff document may be found at: > > http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=http://to > ols.ietf.o > rg/id/draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06.txt > > [Note that unfortunately this identifies a significant > portion of text as new text, when it fact it merely moved.] > > Regards > > Keith > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use > sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip > Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
- [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06 DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06 DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06 Kolomaznik Jan
- Re: [Sip] WGLC for draft-ietf-sip-fork-loop-fix-06 Robert Sparks