[Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3428 (2261)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 13 May 2010 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC83B3A68D6 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.720, BAYES_40=-0.185, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rfqDXfG9hsL for <sip@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABD63A6C22 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id BD639E0661; Thu, 13 May 2010 10:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: bcampbell@dynamicsoft.com, jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com, schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu, huitema@microsoft.com, dgurle@microsoft.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, dean.willis@softarmor.com, drage@alcatel-lucent.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20100513175538.BD639E0661@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:55:38 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: sip@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, brett@broadsoft.com
Subject: [Sip] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC3428 (2261)
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 17:55:50 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3428,
"Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Instant Messaging".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3428&eid=2261

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>

Section: 10

Original Text
-------------
MESSAGE sip:user2@domain.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP proxy.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK123dsghds
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP user1pc.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK776sgdkse;
                                           received=1.2.3.4
Max-Forwards: 69
From: sip:user1@domain.com;tag=49394
To: sip:user2@domain.com
Call-ID: asd88asd77a@1.2.3.4
CSeq: 1 MESSAGE
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 18

Watson, come here.

The message is received by user2, displayed, and a response is
generated, message F3, and sent to the proxy:

SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP proxy.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK123dsghds;
                                         received=192.0.2.1
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP user1pc.domain.com;;branch=z9hG4bK776sgdkse;
                                            received=1.2.3.4
From: sip:user1@domain.com;tag=49394
To: sip:user2@domain.com;tag=ab8asdasd9
Call-ID: asd88asd77a@1.2.3.4
CSeq: 1 MESSAGE
Content-Length: 0

Note that most of the header fields are simply reflected in the
response.  The proxy receives this response, strips off the top Via,
and forwards to the address in the next Via, user1pc.domain.com, the
result being message F4:

SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP user1pc.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK776sgdkse;
                                           received=1.2.3.4
From: sip:user1@domain.com;;tag=49394
To: sip:user2@domain.com;tag=ab8asdasd9
Call-ID: asd88asd77a@1.2.3.4
CSeq: 1 MESSAGE
Content-Length: 0


Corrected Text
--------------
MESSAGE sip:user2@user2pc.domain.com SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP proxy.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK123dsghds
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP user1pc.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK776sgdkse;
                                           received=1.2.3.4
Max-Forwards: 69
From: sip:user1@domain.com;tag=49583
To: sip:user2@domain.com
Call-ID: asd88asd77a@1.2.3.4
CSeq: 1 MESSAGE
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 18

Watson, come here.

The message is received by user2, displayed, and a response is
generated, message F3, and sent to the proxy:

SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP proxy.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK123dsghds;
                                         received=192.0.2.1
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP user1pc.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK776sgdkse;
                                           received=1.2.3.4
From: sip:user1@domain.com;tag=49583
To: sip:user2@domain.com;tag=ab8asdasd9
Call-ID: asd88asd77a@1.2.3.4
CSeq: 1 MESSAGE
Content-Length: 0

Note that most of the header fields are simply reflected in the
response.  The proxy receives this response, strips off the top Via,
and forwards to the address in the next Via, user1pc.domain.com, the
result being message F4:

SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP user1pc.domain.com;branch=z9hG4bK776sgdkse;
                                           received=1.2.3.4
From: sip:user1@domain.com;tag=49583
To: sip:user2@domain.com;tag=ab8asdasd9
Call-ID: asd88asd77a@1.2.3.4
CSeq: 1 MESSAGE
Content-Length: 0


Notes
-----
The corrected text changes F2's request-uri to reflect the binding.
The corrected text proxies received From tag instead of changing it.
The corrected text removes various extra semicolons show within example.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC3428 (draft-ietf-sip-message-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Instant Messaging
Publication Date    : December 2002
Author(s)           : B. Campbell, Ed., J. Rosenberg, H. Schulzrinne, C. Huitema, D. Gurle
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Session Initiation Protocol
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG