[Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-serviceroute-00

Timothy SOETENS <timothy.soetens@alcatel.be> Thu, 13 September 2001 08:56 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA29414 for <sip-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:56:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA01602; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA01569 for <sip@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:26:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from relay1.alcatel.be (alc119.alcatel.be [195.207.101.119]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA29092 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bemail01.net.alcatel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.alcatel.be (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f8D8O5m00167 for <sip@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:24:08 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from alcatel.be ([138.203.67.193]) by bemail01.net.alcatel.be (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) with SMTP id C1256AC6.002E1CA7; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:23:39 +0200
Message-ID: <3BA06D0B.E16E78D9@alcatel.be>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:23:39 +0200
From: Timothy SOETENS <timothy.soetens@alcatel.be>
Organization: Alcatel
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sip mailing list <sip@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Sip] questions about drat-bjorkner-serviceroute-00
Sender: sip-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sip-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi All,

I have some questions regarding the draft
draft-bjorkner-serviceroute-00.txt.

I think it is a good thing to route requests according to the service a
user is subscribed for, but still I am confused in how the service-route
header is used.

1. "The service-route header should only be inserted in the first
request in a call leg." (4.1, page 4) Is it not possible that you first
contact the callee before deciding on which service to use?

2. "If a request contians both route headers and service-route headers
the route headers MUST be used for request routing." (4.1, page 5)
Indeed, if the route headers are used for request routing, it is not
useful to insert service-route headers in the subsequent requests.
However, I have the feeling that service-route headers can be useful in
subsequent requests. 

Comments?

Thanks,
Tim.
-- 
Timothy Soetens
_________________________________________

From the Network Strategy Group @ Alcatel

Tel. +32-3-240.42.11
Fax  +32-3-240.48.88

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip