Re: [Sip] SIP IPv6 ABNF: Essential correction to RFC3261

On 11/19/07 4:44 PM, Colin Perkins wrote:
> Can someone familiar with the issue also check the ABNF in RFC 4566 
> (SDP)? From a quick look, it seems that it has a similar problem...

By my readying, you are correct -- the ABNF rules in 4566 suffer from 
the same flaw. From an ANBF perspective, I would propose that the 
solution is the same as Vijay and Brian detail in their draft. From a 
process perspective, I don't know how to handle it (outside of the 
relatively invisible RFC errata process).

/a

>
>
> Colin
>
>
>
> On 19 Nov 2007, at 19:38, Adam Roach wrote:
>> For the record: this seems to be a real problem in the original ABNF, 
>> and the proposed fix appears correct to me. I support adding this to 
>> the next batch of essential corrections.
>>
>> /a
>>
>> Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:
>>> Folks: While performing the Gen-ART review of the
>>> draft-ietf-sipping-ipv6-torture-test document, an extant bug in
>>> the IPv6 ABNF production rules of RFC3261 was discovered.
>>>
>>> A quick dialog with the chairs resulted in the understanding
>>> that this could potentially be fixed as part of the SIP essential
>>> corrections process, once it was ratified by the WG.
>>>
>>> Brian and I have submitted a short draft describing this bug and
>>> its resolution to the IETF.  Until it appears in the archives, you
>>> can get a copy from
>>> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/sip-ipv6-abnf/draft-gurbani-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix-00.txt 
>>>
>>> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/gurbani/sip-ipv6-abnf/draft-gurbani-sip-ipv6-abnf-fix-00.html 
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> - vijay
>
>

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip