Re: [Sip] -resource-priority-05.txt: Comments and Recommendations (1)

[Janet P Gunn <[e-mail]>]

The .03 draft (and I think also the .04 draft) had a paragraph that said
   "Namespaces do not describe how they relate to other existing
   namespaces, as each namespace is independent of other registrations."

It doesn't seem to be in .05

Maybe it, or something like it, should be put back in.

Janet


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                                                                                                 
                      David R Oran                                                                               
                      <oran                    To:      "James M. Polk" <[e-mail]>                       
                      @cisco.com>              cc:      [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail]        
                      Sent by:                 Subject: Re: [Sip] -resource-priority-05.txt: Comments and        
                      sip-bounces              Recommendations (1)                                               
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 
                      11/15/2004 02:43                                                                           
                      PM                                                                                         
                                                                                                                 
                                                                                                                 





On Nov 15, 2004, at 2:01 PM, James M. Polk wrote:

> Where is "mapping between namespaces" specified in the document now?
>
> I do not believe there is such a sentence/comment/statement, and there
> should not be one, so why was this brought up?
>
If somebody reads the doc expecting to see something and it isn't
there, two possibilities obtain:
(a) they don't "get it"
(b) a reasonable person might think that function a natural one to be
handled, but that's not the approach we took in designing this beastie.

The case at hand seems closer to (b) than (a), so I see no harm in
saying that namespaces are orthogonal as far as the specification is
concerned, and while it may be possible to map behavior between
namespaces, this document doesn't tell you how, and that's intentional.

Dave.

> At 03:22 PM 11/12/2004 -0500, [e-mail] wrote:
>> In a message dated 11/12/2004 11:58:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>> [e-mail] writes:
>>
>>
>>> Can we just add a sentence to the draft saying mapping between
>>> namespaces is out of scope and it should be addressed separately?
>>
>>
>> Yes, such a statement would be fine, but it should be along with a
>> statement that all interrelationship between namespaces is out of
>> scope.
>>
>> Mike
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
>> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
>> Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
>> Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
>
>
> cheers,
> James
>
>                                *******************
>                 Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
> Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
>
David R. Oran
Cisco Fellow
Cisco Systems
7 Ladyslipper Lane
Acton, MA 01720 USA
Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip





_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip