Re: [Sip] Chance to defend position that SIP has had poor consumer traction Etc.

Sure that is probably best to avoid list flame wars that could ensure
on this rather large list.

I quickly setup a mailman private mailing list (no public archiving)
for the purposes of continuing the discussion.

Sign up here:
http://ecommmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/sip_discussion_ecommmedia.com

Once signed up, post using:
sip_discussion@ecommmedia.com

Now dropping off this list on this issue.

Thanks

Lee

On 17/12/2007, Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Lee Dryburgh wrote:
>
> > Marketing for the eComm March 2008 conference (see
> > www.eCommMedia.com) is away to drive ahead with the messages which
> > I give them. One of these messages is critical towards SIP. Before
> > the marketing material is finalised, I'd like to first welcome
> > responses. I'd love to copy all the messages but I may run the risk
> > of getting accused of spamming the list so below I've just copied
> > the section that relates to SIP:
> >
>
> Eek! This is sure to generate a major flamewar!
>
> Please respond directly to Lee, NOT THE LIST! Or, I'll make you guys
> a new list for the flamewar if needed.
>
> --
> Dean
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip
>

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip