RE: [Sip] about H.323 and SIP

There are a few things that are wrong about H.323, too. I'll follow up
offline.

Re: "We tend to believe..." (sigh)

Paul Long
ipDialog, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: sip-admin@ietf.org [mailto:sip-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of Naidu,
Venkata
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 3:20 PM
To: 'Henning G. Schulzrinne'; Naidu, Venkata
Cc: Rosen, Brian; sip@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Sip] about H.323 and SIP

Schulzrinne:

   It would be nice if you point specific things misleading
   in that paper (it serves better for the community)

   Especially in...
   http://www.stanford.edu/~chuhee/project/voip/comp_summary.htm

   I mentioned the previous paper, because below
   comparison is not elaborative (but comprehensive)
   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/sip/h323-comparison.html

   We tend to believe what ever research guys say...

--Venkata Naidu

-> Unfortunately, a fair amount of what's said in that paper
-> about SIP is
-> plain factually wrong. Readers beware.
->
-> "Naidu, Venkata" wrote:
-> >
-> > All:
-> >
-> >   Sorry to extend the issue again...
-> >
-> >   I would suggest interested guys look at unbiased
-> >   comparison of H.323 and SIP at:
-> >
-> >   http://www.stanford.edu/~chuhee/project/voip/comparison.htm
-> >
-> >   As long as there are two, people will never agree
-> >   on only one. This is definitely not a feature, rather a bug!
-> >
->
-> --
-> Henning Schulzrinne   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip