[Sip] TCP to UDP rtcp media attributes in SDP not passing through SBC
Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com> Fri, 12 February 2010 13:13 UTC
Return-Path: <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 0A9C03A6D48 for <sip@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:13:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.854
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=1.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599,
DEAR_FRIEND=2.699, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w0RHf6-wYp6R for
<sip@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qy0-f199.google.com (mail-qy0-f199.google.com
[209.85.221.199]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDB53A6A2F for
<sip@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:13:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qyk37 with SMTP id 37so1349279qyk.15 for <sip@ietf.org>;
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:14:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type; bh=69NS0/374/uK2RvCVejRLg96F6mU7R40hNiHC98QMTA=;
b=C5kUd71JMI3ZNYfpR9BhGBTzyd1stBa9ALOMk1qwPmx/FhPFFzjgovHOnlliga4hil
gszEE8kteQERY8Mtwn5JqmHDBeVErnPLggF/7wTNedi3m1+whIBBAoX8W12Wi2s1F3Iy
+BeEPouZC5EBifUMIeu1EP/UkLRStfmYXEHXw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=iNwKNnX2dKydOU0KttooDfLVuY4+i53gUxa/aaKlzvimcVaIjg8S3iiDdlNaVVHHv0
lEErR9793RNb94QbsJcxd1bBS/WaIcBhuQINeikI3av9h+0HBgxByCNqwjiihgJtK4y9
CO0GevqgVOE84yYPoDVPRJow2qb6cRCAL0bOk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.128.170 with SMTP id k42mr577605qcs.48.1265980469659;
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:14:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:14:29 -0500
Message-ID: <c80c92d1002120514v55e7705y733fc97b3e81392f@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nitin Kapoor <nitinkapoorr@gmail.com>
To: sip@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151757097e2fc81b047f670c34
Subject: [Sip] TCP to UDP rtcp media attributes in SDP not passing through SBC
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>,
<mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:13:17 -0000
Dear Friend,
I have some query about UDP & TCP for signaling.
Basically I am using TCP protocol for signaling from my customer to SBC and
then SBC to Vendor using UDP for signaling. I mean CS user TCP to SBC, UDP
to carrier. And OCS sends initial 183 with sdp that contains rtcp media
attribute information and SBC does not forward formation to carrier via UDP.
Call Flow is like this.
UAC (Private) SBC
UAS(Public)
|-----------Invite(TCP)---------->
| |
|
| |
|<-------- 100 Trying ------------ |
|
| | ----------- Invite
(UDP)----------------------->|
|
| |
| |<--------- 100 Trying
---------------------------|
|
| |
| <---- 183 SDP Session
Progress-------|
| |(183 SDP with RTCP Media
|
| |Attribute).
|
|<--------- 183 SDP -------------
|
|
| 183 SDP Session
progress| |
| Without RTCP Media |
|
|Attribute
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Could anyone please help me out on this scenario. Why it’s not sending the
RTCP attribute to my UAC? Is there anything related to standard.
I can share the Traces, if its required.
Thanks,
Nitin Kapoor
- [Sip] TCP to UDP rtcp media attributes in SDP not… Nitin Kapoor