IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sipbrandy] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-04 - Christer's review

Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 24 May 2018 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B80B12DA4F for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UkwqqV_9dU8i for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 May 2018 05:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22e.google.com (mail-ua0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945D2126DFF for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 05:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v17-v6so944446uak.6 for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 May 2018 05:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zoGUP077oD97xfb3XYt+UnxrywXv3fS5StjXXTTs8wA=; b=P3Vy3YaGFO6Ub+jU24fMc0F8Y7u2hak1e9Uv3DcSKfRp+D1f0pxlagrENcvqRclLlv +785Sw1gX9tJT16Ja1Qc/WbkRtiQdNLSBRCPLefZf4JLsTj8kVxFzfn0+fQRdZASTMPQ kDr3nTYxvYFgRheTyYctsPiTrUdPo4CDx3E6/Ka2NHVTnN2rz7wpAgFb6md273ELwfDA F/Jf6JNeSzkYZ1/uMHybel/4AoRDkAdeY8rkKdtSfG84hdX7INZF+lux2Cf413GYFsBL sO0yalvdCU0AkAVLw8GMfPxz+BSF9ju06kYKvab+1Mw6BhYAUW0aoMO0wZgE4HxT3urx RpdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zoGUP077oD97xfb3XYt+UnxrywXv3fS5StjXXTTs8wA=; b=uBbwoYM57KgQgTqnFYnogvrmLePK2PoFX4+SX1VPzb2MqZ5syiFAXzLM3q6oEZOISp MIFYwO8WJGICiDXXvcvFbIG5vp3Xhs7+yRpBnbEx/cHZ79+JU5q7jIe7E9XXMrzu6pDm +MRGPvM5uzx09D3jai3EdhApCO3o0sLsXSwD0yrmYFxfYz1uoh9LL7Jh5AWGf9gAUbwY hdY7Z0Ey5mHLLnYmDs5umu5OQ8JX3WZRbg2NrZ9oCFlHuh8msp2PiJkP8tkIdbUD7OY4 X27ajitqdbrALkIWIeCGfrzqHTMXI4Jv6Q/2ZD9aCJ9m7PxDUJk2wq40Ux5O59BcuJKg aKMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwe7glLJ3Gg7tYpE0Ei7VWVpnNlV/uy2qr3X8+yrGFN+GiTuxZJz P/0Qa9DlktHUpVOIeCpX13BI+2dhjQizIEnLzzk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrYkN/ScKjrvEq4FiT8aypM54h7kZUBoOkpAQ3Yt9ko+uZg8PErGYmxT9Wrs1YLpB3WJp+G6SAIOXroyUnC/ys=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3271:: with SMTP id y46-v6mr4765879uad.122.1527164772686; Thu, 24 May 2018 05:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a1f:9744:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2018 05:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B72F05085@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
References: <D6FF722F.2E7B0%christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> <CAB7PXwTrakvHFaLs8sR_BPGtDcrbvmz3NLw1jOBdA8KOeC=Yqg@mail.gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B72F05085@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
From: Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 13:26:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAB7PXwQBHvVX_FB+O5TOT_5RM37yhOZOva-P+SePkZvjrf1D2w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: "sipbrandy@ietf.org" <sipbrandy@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/-r0sUdkRGykt7tVRibiycR8nRj0>
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp-04 - Christer's review
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 12:26:16 -0000

On 24 May 2018 at 12:53, Christer Holmberg
<christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:


>
> Has there been discussions on whether the subsequent offer really is the same?

Not sure whether this has been discussed explicitly with regard to this draft.

>
> For example, if the initial O/A has resulted in SAVP, would you still use AVP in a subsequent offer?
>

Yes the recommendation would be to use AVP in a subsequent offer
otherwise things can go wrong when you consider things like 3PCC etc.


> Whatever the outcome, it needs to be documented.
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email