IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts

Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 11:35 UTC

Return-Path: <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1108B129C41 for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:35:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 511NL6JC1S-R for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B86129C6A for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id n11so61767046wma.0 for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=n0nhuMixTr4aH4odPAokheEaaytHDs695QXl7GNcSDw=; b=GtArE619rpxjTmY6sFaU9xC3zBaw5jPBtZK7XixMl6vQ8bArIM7OCGixMJADzlzF4T duXvPSVOOHmPI7arQx0Z4BFDT1Tp8LrMBQY20Px00W7z31ynPGjj9ZAFGjyg2LwcBiNM ovJtP87+Bm7s4H3l/oEOT/CKUrSVeh5e9D5kp8uNJL5c0icLmiGJXkzm1UmZD0QblVek /PJxHyOeXMnEtyCQtORX9NbDutSSEs+9YiuitHw5udIQRyvWxREsyl8UguMjhqCN/qpW ulv7+6+IXtRGW2lZtQzbIT+4LozWz86AppCRvCx9qfuIJf+oUpRC4x+Ab+oqY5GGlwAJ DK4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n0nhuMixTr4aH4odPAokheEaaytHDs695QXl7GNcSDw=; b=XGP1jY2PLS/ZiI2bobq879XSGgzL/gIcOvAjRDmqgRtrW9ZfNzEurMUw98pE2gjPPl yAGj8hn+leWvqD7exc8cj4Dngr+mJShrmUH2W6VB+Dtammc/7KYJXJDkH1ndp5te0+V4 l7e4VQOJtoc3ZcqeqEao43zZDTnL2ybcBOoDS0HpMsyV6ZjW7Mdi77NZGjMvIRqZsIcX cSQ2M9iNm8+qLAdwR0eLSFNREOiNC8nGj/VNzPHdMlYDU1VHv4nlvRf2Qw6JOVyqmWlQ DteGYQf4m7JdGsRQFzh+ptvWfhPHdBFB8NNJL1tuNAe0aL56yPKrmJHR1eyIgBgsnVH6 CaJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3tWnQ1YcsJsDLU1rgJC4O3AmwYHkn3yOWpc2m03LraOZnyZEB6dAq41xjTUBwYnshwYYdpHfwxR6jo1Q==
X-Received: by 10.28.87.6 with SMTP id l6mr9471678wmb.109.1490009718077; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.182.150 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:35:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55773ace-3e3e-16b9-003d-7256e42342c8@ericsson.com>
References: <55773ace-3e3e-16b9-003d-7256e42342c8@ericsson.com>
From: Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:35:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAB7PXwSeASthoN464s8OSsvGUje+GGA0pNzCZKmxnnouw_V1sA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Cc: sipbrandy@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144222cf53ff8054b27eb0b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/9XrHEwoa_6ZpBTS50f7Pic6wbHY>
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:35:22 -0000

Regarding the status of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation-00.
This draft will be discussed during the MMUSIC session at IETF98 next week
and I am hoping that MMUSIC will agree to adopt this draft.  The comments
received so far on the MMUSIC list have all been positive regarding this.
We need this draft to be adopted by MMUSIC to allow
draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp to progress since it documents the fact that an
update to RFC 4568 is needed to allow SRTP to be negotiated using the
RTP/AVP profile.

Please support the adoption of
draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in MMUSIC.

Regards
Andy



On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo <
Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> even if we will not have a SIPBRANDY session in Chicago, it would be
> useful for the working group to discuss what are the next steps on the
> list.
>
> To start those discussions, we would like to ask the authors of our two
> working group items below to let the list know what is the status of
> their draft and what are the next steps:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/
>
> We would also like to ask the authors of the MMUSIC draft below, which
> is related to the SIPBRANDY work, to give us a status update:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-mmusic-
> opportunistic-negotiation/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sipbrandy mailing list
> Sipbrandy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email