Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts

"Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC18E129406 for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 02:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=sonusnetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fLsMDEZy6ktO for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 02:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-126.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-126.mimecast.com [216.205.24.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9AC1289C3 for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 02:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=SonusNetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-sonusnet-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=LGzLLj7fhxRjI10PwmXUDz5a/16WVTAufPjIUntKtyM=; b=NnzRkE7Lyr7lkS8+Gl/jdmeQ30Ab2yECmkhgwg9LQaF5IZ6ZLR4pz9tQEr7Q3ClXjB6TgFJISdKnbt0S1zP1fMyhi7xfLydY2Dfz/eeRybB/3AnzgKQJQBTJc3Yphs81qiqpmdyfdQ6GjwDiNw+l4JTSB363PBwIPmx1PwVwz8I=
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01lp0120.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.120]) (Using TLS) by us-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-131-UVlU-q5xMRmaaOcDRc7ldg-1; Mon, 08 May 2017 05:12:34 -0400
Received: from SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.210.141) by SN2PR03MB2351.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.166.210.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1075.11; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:12:31 +0000
Received: from SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.210.141]) by SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.210.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1075.019; Mon, 8 May 2017 09:12:31 +0000
From: "Asveren, Tolga" <tasveren@sonusnet.com>
To: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "sipbrandy@ietf.org" <sipbrandy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts
Thread-Index: AQHSiDPi5pHrTmEZMEGj1oy5FRpwa6Gdy7CAgEzLpgCAAA3goA==
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 09:12:30 +0000
Message-ID: <SN2PR03MB235040B0C5CBB6CED83CB1BFB2EE0@SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <55773ace-3e3e-16b9-003d-7256e42342c8@ericsson.com> <CAB7PXwSeASthoN464s8OSsvGUje+GGA0pNzCZKmxnnouw_V1sA@mail.gmail.com> <a3a8f3a6-49b0-5add-d413-db9c7e86209c@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <a3a8f3a6-49b0-5add-d413-db9c7e86209c@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [73.29.18.75]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN2PR03MB2351; 7:5LY+ZcGrQzM8sP1YaLVL7Du/U210i3zbQKj3y7L7J8nMaXPUzjkLowBsBs29ELLrwxy5TsTRysjTdqganE5XgckhWl2L+38HxuEwl0IPFQLyP3SOTWNTAM/6CVG7LfMCrddpqg6Q/NtD3MWXwZp5X9C1Lz/eTUNpwNNQP6aG9Lp75yMx8CGdSrj65/3e8psozi861mWl7O2VUlhO1HD14dzhbivlisbr7FjI1BXtQ/fyxZ2krLMeb6qbuRVyzkym8aZtuOgAyngF7yEH+V0g0tK5H9dx4k2O0AnO0uRKUgisdqsBzf/0Wv0W7ctZRDvjPn+ayryyuqR7E40EkjP/FA==; 20:gNMwkpmckh8WivhOSOZSJXCL0BAajHKQnYBYc3AvAPCfRYxxlt1IH+YSc8TxgnytFwZ7w5PuWgsNgXPNnYQxUopYQkTmUShFzEyvQaWfJXbYv5GTLSZDMsAK3UNZQ1nkwomWYoUd3DKfmmepT3zhQ5I2T+ZCdSulkPV6MqNdIeg=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 9d85c54d-23ce-4fbf-bc94-08d495f25b4a
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081); SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN2PR03MB23516991F10024AA80D4E586B2EE0@SN2PR03MB2351.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(37575265505322)(120809045254105);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351;
x-forefront-prvs: 0301360BF5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39450400003)(39830400002)(377454003)(13464003)(24454002)(3846002)(33656002)(6116002)(9686003)(102836003)(2900100001)(86362001)(7696004)(39060400002)(77096006)(25786009)(3660700001)(6436002)(8676002)(55016002)(99286003)(2906002)(4326008)(53546009)(189998001)(5660300001)(2950100002)(38730400002)(81166006)(74316002)(478600001)(8936002)(6506006)(229853002)(7736002)(6246003)(122556002)(66066001)(53936002)(6306002)(305945005)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(3280700002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN2PR03MB2351; H:SN2PR03MB2350.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sonusnet.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2017 09:12:31.0569 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 29a671dc-ed7e-4a54-b1e5-8da1eb495dc3
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN2PR03MB2351
X-MC-Unique: UVlU-q5xMRmaaOcDRc7ldg-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/CDc1BMyhGDWU3VclyCXpi0phfj4>
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 09:12:39 -0000

I hope this draft will proceed forward and eventually -and hopefully soon- become a RFC. It addresses a real problem with a practical solution.

Just as additional info, it seems likely that the "sister document" draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation-00 will be adopted as a WG soon.

Thanks,
Tolga

-----Original Message-----
From: Sipbrandy [mailto:sipbrandy-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 4:20 AM
To: Andy Hutton <andyhutton.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: sipbrandy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Status of our drafts

Hi Andy,

please, note that draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp has expired:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/

What are your plans to keep it alive?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 20/03/2017 1:35 PM, Andy Hutton wrote:
> 
> Regarding the status
> of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation-00.
> This draft will be discussed during the MMUSIC session at IETF98 next 
> week and I am hoping that MMUSIC will agree to adopt this draft.  The 
> comments received so far on the MMUSIC list have all been positive 
> regarding this.  We need this draft to be adopted by MMUSIC to allow 
> draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp to progress since it documents the fact 
> that an update to RFC 4568 is needed to allow SRTP to be negotiated 
> using the RTP/AVP profile.
> 
> Please support the adoption of
> draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation in MMUSIC.
> 
> Regards
> Andy
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo 
> <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com 
> <mailto:Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>>
> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     even if we will not have a SIPBRANDY session in Chicago, it would be
>     useful for the working group to discuss what are the next steps on
>     the list.
> 
>     To start those discussions, we would like to ask the authors of our two
>     working group items below to let the list know what is the status of
>     their draft and what are the next steps:
> 
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-osrtp/>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/
>     <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/>
> 
>     We would also like to ask the authors of the MMUSIC draft below, which
>     is related to the SIPBRANDY work, to give us a status update:
> 
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-negotiation/
>     
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hutton-mmusic-opportunistic-ne
> gotiation/>
> 
>     Thanks,
> 
>     Gonzalo
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sipbrandy mailing list
>     Sipbrandy@ietf.org <mailto:Sipbrandy@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy
>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipbrandy mailing list
Sipbrandy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy