IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sipbrandy] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 28 February 2019 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B64130F2B; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:51:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3HhyjIZkzBWx; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:51:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C268130F8E; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 09:51:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1SHpJ1Y042775 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:51:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1551376283; bh=v8LR3KrxDAZCgluueRCZLuka1HzsiQz6RG+S9AuloL0=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=FEGNjnzy3ei7lwJZ1DWuZsudjh3jcec2qcnDwNUTATTPldIoMfAL8u+2m/Yh7/yDr Bv1xkSycEnfDUVRWhlxQhXbywFPQSB7HnnFqSK4LNZMCCARQtJAITy4spJWnW9DHlk lrGQqTXOfqEx0dru9JUYPLD9MngDC1I84avCQNI8=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.29]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <6C532114-CC20-428D-8FF3-8ED86CBB23FD@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_343215BC-AB51-497B-842C-5851F8E973A0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:51:18 -0600
In-Reply-To: <155135129635.28740.17745438119617083569.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec@ietf.org, sipbrandy@ietf.org, sipbrandy-chairs@ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
References: <155135129635.28740.17745438119617083569.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/EiX8XCkU49Pa36QCN95cdOVnBUs>
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:51:34 -0000


> On Feb 28, 2019, at 4:54 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Given that use of ietf-mmusic-trickle-ice-sip is recommended, it feels like
> this doc should be a normative reference.
> 

I agree. Good catch.

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email