Re: [Sipbrandy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07.txt

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 01 February 2019 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7A8130E8F for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 12:54:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GMN0FgELP-Rt for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 12:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A20124408 for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 12:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDD7300A1C for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:35:46 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AT8pRl69ggmM for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:35:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-108-45-137-105.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.137.105]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31973300400 for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:35:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 15:54:00 -0500
References: <154905422167.28593.2496633140005687294@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: sipbrandy@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <154905422167.28593.2496633140005687294@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-Id: <1C529568-6E11-45AD-B26A-178E09764F15@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/JItSw_94I5uX2Qy3dz7DxgXqyQg>
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07.txt
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 20:54:06 -0000

The changes were made to address the comments raised by Ben Campbell in the ART AD Review.

Russ


> On Feb 1, 2019, at 3:50 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the SIP Best-practice Recommendations Against Network Dangers to privacY WG of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Best Practices for Securing RTP Media Signaled with SIP
>        Authors         : Jon Peterson
>                          Richard Barnes
>                          Russ Housley
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07.txt
> 	Pages           : 14
> 	Date            : 2019-02-01
> 
> Abstract:
>   Although the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) includes a suite of
>   security services that has been expanded by numerous specifications
>   over the years, there is no single place that explains how to use SIP
>   to establish confidential media sessions.  Additionally, existing
>   mechanisms have some feature gaps that need to be identified and
>   resolved in order for them to address the pervasive monitoring threat
>   model.  This specification describes best practices for negotiating
>   confidential media with SIP, including both comprehensive protection
>   solutions which bind the media to SIP-layer identities as well as
>   opportunistic security solutions.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/