Re: [Sipbrandy] Do we need to meet in Chicago?

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Thu, 09 February 2017 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371EC129658 for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:45:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qn3rVjhNglCg for <sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:45:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD5C0129577 for <sipbrandy@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:45:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=916; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1486655155; x=1487864755; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=WgLMHT2aYMjKD+yp0hfDj7XWt3RbEYtOmhpdGb6NrXo=; b=H9dItD22W6XZnO+TeSWhQFYmVcIeg+e65VihZ82G2M7IipyU2cGVVekl jwWk3U6X7GLhVgcQUUlI3EScahk2p0lCpo6t47pIiW6ht/HEr4KpYTBJE gFqgELGaDlMRuFJeMyP3tRbHPU0Q0QU3cbsPUck0ZxO0QXPEUBJWw5FaI I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DkAQAajpxY/4MNJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1FhgQkHg1KKCJFqH5U2ggwfC4UuSgIaglA/GAECAQEBAQEBAWIdC4RpAQEBAwEBASEROgsFCwIBCBgCAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQOBYlsCA6ve4Ili0cBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYELhUGCBQiCYoUOgkwugjEFm3ABkhGBYxiFF4lzkxIBHzh+TxU8EQGGMHWHcoEMAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,349,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="204942205"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Feb 2017 15:45:54 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v19FjsJc024276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Feb 2017 15:45:55 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:45:54 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:45:54 -0600
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "sipbrandy@ietf.org" <sipbrandy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Sipbrandy] Do we need to meet in Chicago?
Thread-Index: AQHSguuYL/f7a0scnE+QysAqO9K3XA==
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:45:54 +0000
Message-ID: <D40F2FEC-09C7-4305-9A7A-E0365F79EFBE@cisco.com>
References: <a5fa28ca-72e0-42a5-9914-64e8a6f376ba@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <a5fa28ca-72e0-42a5-9914-64e8a6f376ba@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.215.138]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <62F636824998424E98F887CA65E99C8A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/LIoVHxvuVWxYFdOisi6WMtkTfBs>
Cc: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Do we need to meet in Chicago?
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 15:45:57 -0000

Hi - 

We haven’t heard from anyone on this yet.  Are we to assume this means there is no need to meet in Chicago?  An explicit yes/no is most helpful.

Thanks,

Gonzalo


> On Feb 7, 2017, at 3:20 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> we need to decide whether or not we request a time slot for Chicago by
> Friday. If you think SIPBRANDY should meet in Chicago and have energy to
> do so, please say so on this list. Thanks!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipbrandy mailing list
> Sipbrandy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy