IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sipbrandy] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E9128B36; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:00:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CuJATyclSNlf; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B49C13108F; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bens-macbook.lan (cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x25H07QO018427 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 11:00:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1551805211; bh=tba9Z3uBe3XmHUq9VFLBQIFVc+8gmnhgygW5nw7Tcko=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=LWkEyciJqt5zGsDgOX0T0eI2ORQZLzIiWSrX3d1HjSXoOESUWpmf8P5q2Gg5zVZOP Ar9rEf7rA+B1DyNmmMaKct5jSMaYTjlpF2ruUx5qjoHiIv8M0LxHo37nI1mtsQwzIZ ir2Lz6LWKndNvLxeaghV64zBI9TJztD393W+ELOQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105] claimed to be bens-macbook.lan
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <D548A39A-0D60-4E49-8676-23D280573468@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A21B7DCE-7B59-43CB-953A-0AE91F714D69"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:00:00 -0600
In-Reply-To: <155179439719.24571.5092882734979449461.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec@ietf.org, sipbrandy@ietf.org, sipbrandy-chairs@ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
References: <155179439719.24571.5092882734979449461.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/rtu73mO82y4SIh40m3j1-uxBmiE>
Subject: Re: [Sipbrandy] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 17:00:17 -0000


> On Mar 5, 2019, at 7:59 AM, Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> wrote:
> 
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> * Section 4.3.
> 
> I had a hard time understanding this updated text. Either this is incorrect
> (e.g. Should this refer to 8224 instead of 4474?) or it needs some
> clarification.
> 
> "The examples in [RFC4916] are based on the original [RFC4916], and will not
> match signatures using [RFC4474].”

That is an error. It should say:

"The examples in [RFC4916] are based on the original [RFC4474], and will not match signatures using [RFC8224].””

 IIUC, the authors have fixed it in the working copy.

Thanks!

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email