[Sipbrandy] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh@kaloom.com>
X-Original-To: sipbrandy@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sipbrandy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417B513117F; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:59:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec@ietf.org, Gonzalo Camarillo <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>, sipbrandy-chairs@ietf.org, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.92.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <155179439719.24571.5092882734979449461.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 05:59:57 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipbrandy/zjq7E09SStGRG7T1UbHpFdrWNw4>
Subject: [Sipbrandy] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipbrandy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SIPBRANDY working group discussion list <sipbrandy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipbrandy/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipbrandy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipbrandy>, <mailto:sipbrandy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:59:57 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipbrandy-rtpsec/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

* Section 4.3.

I had a hard time understanding this updated text. Either this is incorrect
(e.g. Should this refer to 8224 instead of 4474?) or it needs some
clarification.

"The examples in [RFC4916] are based on the original [RFC4916], and will not
match signatures using [RFC4474]."