[sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion?
"Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> Mon, 26 July 2010 13:31 UTC
Return-Path: <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112C23A6C03 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.325
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.325 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.726, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6KO9ytB5Sv9y for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csmailgw2.commscope.com (csmailgw2.commscope.com [198.135.207.242]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF98B3A6BF2 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.86.20.103] ([10.86.20.103]:35122 "EHLO ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com") by csmailgw2.commscope.com with ESMTP id S342082Ab0GZNbU (ORCPT <rfc822; sipcore@ietf.org>); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:31:20 -0500
Received: from SISPE7HC2.commscope.com (10.97.4.13) by ACDCE7HC2.commscope.com (10.86.20.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.436.0; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 08:26:20 -0500
Received: from SISPE7MB1.commscope.com ([fe80::9d82:a492:85e3:a293]) by SISPE7HC2.commscope.com ([fe80::58c3:2447:f977:57c3%10]) with mapi; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:26:18 +0800
From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
To: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:28:15 +0800
Thread-Topic: geo URI and conveyance: conclusion?
Thread-Index: AcssxmcFTrI8IGTRQDOY58NCmnbZ0A==
Message-ID: <8B0A9FCBB9832F43971E38010638454F03EB77364D@SISPE7MB1.commscope.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-puzzleid: {0F6F4234-4B15-49C3-82FA-A4CB60316FC8}
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: OSo= BjyK ByBV CIQZ D9Kw EWGa GCTB G8FW JRyv JayJ JniE OZCD PjoK Qvlf Rfve S6/k; 2; YQBsAGUAeABhAG4AZABlAHIALgBtAGEAeQByAGgAbwBmAGUAcgBAAG4AaQBjAC4AYQB0ADsAcwBpAHAAYwBvAHIAZQBAAGkAZQB0AGYALgBvAHIAZwA=; Sosha1_v1; 7; {0F6F4234-4B15-49C3-82FA-A4CB60316FC8}; bQBhAHIAdABpAG4ALgB0AGgAbwBtAHMAbwBuAEAAYQBuAGQAcgBlAHcALgBjAG8AbQA=; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:28:15 GMT; ZwBlAG8AIABVAFIASQAgAGEAbgBkACAAYwBvAG4AdgBlAHkAYQBuAGMAZQA6ACAAYwBvAG4AYwBsAHUAcwBpAG8AbgA/AA==
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BCN: Meridius 1000 Version 3.4 on csmailgw2.commscope.com
X-BCN-Sender: Martin.Thomson@andrew.com
Cc: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
Subject: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion?
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:31:03 -0000
I missed the conclusions regarding geo URI. I got the bit where we decided that we needed to have _some_ text, but I'm not sure what we decided what the text might look like. Help me?
- [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Thomson, Martin
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Thomson, Martin
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? James M. Polk
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? James M. Polk
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Thomson, Martin
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? James M. Polk
- Re: [sipcore] geo URI and conveyance: conclusion? Adam Roach