Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-digest-scheme comments

Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 25 May 2019 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D631200E0 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dv-TzSUjJDFd for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x134.google.com (mail-it1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2F271200CE for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x134.google.com with SMTP id m140so18301487itg.2 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3JxzAyhoOXKZ2kxECzjOby6LnUarifnCI6GAEfsnEF0=; b=K5IbVP5dvUZiyupALJPh1Gr+j+8Hm+kqaImFVGZt9cgqge8aVMEsSvrJDy7K/g14uh Cd3XG/5X/8dFSHYZOTaPer6+xKBtw03qEeutn0fcesCN5v/pechVM8yuhleSL0C+CDFI oQLQkO8WRW8mOnP//j5qp9oEWsBgEhFLdq/tciiq93GAssjrW+/A5cy4Y5+homAIzrZ1 53jb8quCTnhZ0FpJsy4GdTc7LwAvf1Dlz7AFaPEH0jXqG7aRvdoHeG0GmDpNYpmKHNse /pYMxiHiqAtcVsnIf+xqGJwrAKOHXouUkujqFVtbDAc/0381ET19KFmiTWqeavJB8PDD W1sA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3JxzAyhoOXKZ2kxECzjOby6LnUarifnCI6GAEfsnEF0=; b=ou7+9+7cWBK93Nb9rsAVsbQ7y+BKVEFqLU3MRDJHvGnG9qAQZTzpncB7MOsY5zlp0h zlliCDOMxGn3O6Nw9coDNq1QQ3c0v8SnPXOhY7+U29jdV4Ij4umGZTL+yD6BEbQ6zHgP lPd7kOAZty/SfGXMKQABQkT8R7AmnABEhznENemU9qj1EGJXRiABjHoGNuMTamknjuT5 fUG4Q8b2IoPfdsO06f1Bpyz6FiyesxiQGt1TDuLvi0tdG/CCwQAaPuts1TEAgRnQdmiQ EFCBYGTaeQm3yawKCKLjiz7yNoLyhk394qnJowYGrP1v0gq7Xz5xchA/eJqA0RrjVMgB 2JpQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU7osqPHmz3LBgO4m4XTnPeUE/w0asV3EWJuPDomAwESIxD7EH1 hdW0Jt4uko1K2BLT09P+U/lWUjLQTUDx7fWxAtY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwINXL9BLZR616IjqOBTHvj7X3PuX3GM1AVgJ8pt+cMluwRrbhxNy8WZm420OcSeKk+CJlZFTxeovstqCvTFK4=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:c241:: with SMTP id i62mr21259383itg.21.1558801886023; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:cbc1:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C34B4DBE-CCF6-49FD-BE86-72470490E6DF@ericsson.com>
References: <DE595AFF-5DEA-4A32-8527-10B841D6C7C1@edvina.net> <CAGL6epLMHoneH6PNgeF5TgJhveh-xWeZSW6XQDBB2Gf5mS9eRQ@mail.gmail.com> <C1431DCD-C4DD-4BFA-9C5D-E4DFE7B0F2DA@edvina.net> <B4A08741-A092-480C-AE12-2DD25D7835D0@ericsson.com> <CAGL6epJTv+Dytk_VHNi4Sk0mimVj=cMqWR4u9uSg1q+RcUQJ_Q@mail.gmail.com> <238df72e-fb9a-3849-67b5-b3c4ffa8f03e@alum.mit.edu> <C34B4DBE-CCF6-49FD-BE86-72470490E6DF@ericsson.com>
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 12:31:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGL6epLvyeaNhco3+Oy6d48OCTJCyue7fvmfjrRKBZBuJYhH=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b114c90589b8d825"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/4dlwMQjKW8X3VB7iABp1l9f11fw>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-digest-scheme comments
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 16:31:29 -0000

I am fine with removing the note about -sess.

Regards,
 Rifaat


On Saturday, May 25, 2019, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> >>>     If -sess variant was defined in RFC 7616, it was obviously not
> >>>     mentioned in RFC 3261 __
> >>>
> >>     What is the difference between the session variant and the
> >>     non-session variant? What is meant by "session"? RFC 7616 doesn't
> >>     give any explanation, and I couldn't find anything by googling
> either.
> >
> >    BTW: -sess was not introduced in 7616. It also appeared in 2617,
> though
> >    only as MD5-sess.
>
> If that's the case, then I assume "-sess" is already a part of SIP, and we
> don't need to say anything.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>