[sipcore] draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis - hi-targeted-to-uri

OKUMURA Shinji <shin@softfront.co.jp> Fri, 10 July 2009 06:41 UTC

Return-Path: <shin@softfront.co.jp>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EE33A6CEC for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.733
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.733 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXbJGddwTgTM for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.softfront.co.jp (rt1.softfront.co.jp [221.186.247.166]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C29833A6923 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from softfront.co.jp by mail2.softfront.co.jp id AA02644 ; 10 Jul 2009 15:41:51 +0900
From: OKUMURA Shinji <shin@softfront.co.jp>
To: sipcore@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:41:49 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: HidemaruMail 5.18 (WinNT,501)
Message-Id: <6CA0129806DD4shin@softfront.co.jp>
Subject: [sipcore] draft-barnes-sipcore-rfc4244bis - hi-targeted-to-uri
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:41:26 -0000

Hi,

I have one suggestion.

In the draft hi-targeted-to-uri is defined as follows

hi-targeted-to-uri = name-addr

If there is no special reason for the restriction, I think
addr-spec should be added as follows

hi-targeted-to-uri = name-addr/addr-spec

Regards,
Shinji