Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-01 - SIP entities

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 7/20/17 3:33 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:

>      There are four likely models:
>      
>      * the call type (and spam-quotient) information may be shown to users, but most likely when reviewing voice mail, not a ringing call (where a simple binary indicator is probably more suitable, derived from information in the draft, possibly)
> 
> RS>  That’s what I’ve been thinking.  The binary indicator is most useful during ringing and that is the 2-3 seconds you have when you look at the UA.  Some Data Analytics vendors have indicated there is zero difference in consumer behavior on binary display (good vs bad red vs green) vs granular scoring (0-100) display for instance.  This is really the VERISAT 3GPP parameter for inband SIP usage vs some other out of band transmittal (HTTP) to the UA.

Ring tones could be used to indicate more than a binary choice while 
remaining easy and quick to understand.

> RS> Sure but this is ultimately a consumer / enterprise decision on who does what to analyze the call.  My guess is most consumers (98%) would want the carrier to deal with it.  That’s what we pay them for and life is too complicated as it is.  

Speak for yourself. Admittedly perhaps everyone reading this will fall 
within the 2%. But lots of people are already familiar with configuring 
their ring tones and dialer. It is not at all hard to imagine quite a 
lot of people (at least those < 30 years old) wanting to tweak this stuff.

	Thanks,
	Paul