Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU into its UA Contact marked?
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Tue, 07 September 2010 13:41 UTC
Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF29C3A68EA for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBDogry8AdpR for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5883A6A18 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAEPehUxAZnwN/2dsb2JhbACgcnGjEJsCgm6CTwSKGA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,328,1280707200"; d="scan'208";a="156481635"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Sep 2010 13:41:28 +0000
Received: from [161.44.174.142] (dhcp-161-44-174-142.cisco.com [161.44.174.142]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o87DfSje029688; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 13:41:28 GMT
Message-ID: <4C864108.4060900@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:41:28 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
References: <061.f3e7a20653cdf403663b0bffba4c43b4@tools.ietf.org>, <DF18BFD3-F136-4BC0-81B1-D16DA4657951@ntt-at.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79C09@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <35ECC1DD-6DD6-4103-AC47-A2F9A0D69DAD@ntt-at.com> <4C80EF97.4090703@cisco.com> <2E92FEF2-DCBD-44A9-869B-CCE2BB98278F@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E92FEF2-DCBD-44A9-869B-CCE2BB98278F@ntt-at.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>, sipcore issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>, "worley@alum.mit.edu" <worley@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU into its UA Contact marked?
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:41:09 -0000
I wasn't advocating anything in particular. I haven't been following the proposals closely enough to have something sensible to suggest. Shida Schubert wrote: > Paul, > > It sounds like you are advocating not to tag GRUU > the mapped-to entry with "rc" and treat it like an > AoR. > > I too think it's cleaner to leave GRUU out of tagging. > > Whether "gr" parameter appears in the H-I is self > made or not, UAS receiving the request can look for > "gr" param in the H-I and determine if the request > was meant for registerer generated GRUU or self > made. > > Regards > Shida > > On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:52 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > >> Be very careful here. RFC 5627 describes a technique for constructing gruus that are associated with AORs. It also describes "self made GRUUs" which are simply URIs that are naturally globally routable. Both kinds get the gr parameter. Self made gruus may have *no* association with an AOR at all. >> >> While it might "work", tagging a self made gruu as an AOR would at least be confusing. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> Shida Schubert wrote: >>> I just re-read GRUU and realized that, for some reason I thought public GRUU was specified as a type of AoR in the spec. I guess the question then is whether we want to expand the semantics of "rc" to include GRUU's mapping to contact address. >>> After all GRUU can still be identified in the H-I using the "gr" parameter, so keeping the text as is may not be such a big deal. So may be adding text to identify GRUU in H-I is all we need. Regards >>> Shida >>> On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:53 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote: >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shida Schubert [shida@ntt-at.com] >>>> >>>> AFAIK mapping of GRUU to registered contact >>>> when proxy is retargeting will result to registered >>>> contact marked with "rc". >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> >>>> A GRUU is not an AOR and the text states that "rc" is to be used *only* for the mappings from AORs to their registered contacts. >>>> >>>> Dale >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipcore mailing list >>> sipcore@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore > >
- [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU into … sipcore issue tracker
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Elwell, John
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU i… Mary Barnes