Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket-02
Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 20:39 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990E621F85D4 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 13:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.482
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4BO8LyEnFfTv for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 13:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9FE21F85D0 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 13:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-228.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q44Kcx5U058096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 May 2012 15:39:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4FA43E62.5080705@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 15:38:58 -0500
From: Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
References: <CALiegfmw+ouWqoVbsiMuq2CJ4TxkeREVVbw308FzwKpUUrw7tw@mail.gmail.com> <4F8C5EC6.8090202@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F8C5EC6.8090202@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket@tools.ietf.org, SIPCORE Chairs <sipcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket-02
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: SIPCORE Chairs <sipcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 20:39:04 -0000
[as chair] Based on the significant positive feedback on the mailing list and the lack of any explicit objections to adoption, I am declaring consensus for using draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket as the basis for the working group document to satisfy our Websockets transport milestone. Authors: Please submit a draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-00 document as soon as is convenient. There is no need to wait for document content changes to submit the document. Thank you. /a On 4/16/12 1:02 PM, Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair wrote: > [as chair] > > SIPCORE Working Group: > > This is a call for adoption of the draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket-02 > document to satisfy our recently added milestone to define a > WebSockets transport for the SIP protocol. Interested parties should > voice their support and/or concerns on the SIPCORE mailing list. The > chairs plan to make a determination of consensus on Friday, April 27th. > > Thank you. The draft announcement follows. > > /a > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [sipcore] New Version Notification for > draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket-02.txt > Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:49:38 +0200 > From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> > To: SIPCORE WG <sipcore@ietf.org> > > A new version of I-D, draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket-02.txt has been > successfully submitted by Iñaki Baz Castillo and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Filename: draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket > Revision: 02 > Title: The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Session > Initiation Protocol (SIP) > Creation date: 2012-04-16 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 20 > > Abstract: > The WebSocket protocol enables two-way realtime communication between > clients and servers. This document specifies a new WebSocket sub- > protocol as a reliable transport mechanism between SIP (Session > Initiation Protocol) entities and enables usage of the SIP protocol > in new scenarios. > > > - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket-02 > - http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ibc-sipcore-sip-websocket-02.txt > > > This new version incorporates improvements and changes based on the > comments and reviews on the previous version, along with the consensus > got in IETF 83 Paris. > > > As usual, comments are welcome. Thanks a lot. > >
- [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcore-si… Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Vijay K. Gurbani
- [sipcore] New Version Notification for draft-ibc-… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Gonzalo Salgueiro
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Olle E. Johansson
- [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful proxy… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Brett Tate
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- [sipcore] Incoming call notification for websocke… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Incoming call notification for webs… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Incoming call notification for webs… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… José Luis Millán
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Nataraju A.B
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Christer Holmberg
- [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new URI? Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Bob Penfield
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-implement… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- [sipcore] Interaction between Websocket server & … Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Frank W. Miller
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Ravindran, Parthasarathi
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sipcore] Should we change mandatory-to-imple… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sipcore] Stateless or Transaction stateful p… Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Adoption: draft-ibc-sipcor… Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair
- Re: [sipcore] Websocket is a new transport or new… Dean Willis