Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-02.txt

I agree - the changes are meant to be purely editorial. Thus, if the chairs
believe that this is ready for WGLC, that would be a good outcome in my
book...

That said, I'm happy to do a presentation remotely. From what I can tell,
SIPCORE ends at 18:40 Singapore and is 5:40 am NYC, so not completely
ridiculous.

Henning

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net> wrote:

> One possibility is for Henning to do a remote presentation in sipcore.
> Time zone challenges of course.
>
> Brian
>
> On Nov 1, 2017, at 11:21 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>
> I've looked over the groups meeting later in the week, and can't find
> another session that is likely to have the correct community of interest.
>
> I've also looked over the changes to the document, and they seem entirely
> editorial (albeit with a change that technically does impact the wire
> protocol). It's not clear that there are any remaining open issues that
> would clearly benefit from face-to-face time. Henning: do you have some
> questions you specifically wanted to address in the meeting? Or did you
> just want to present a list of changes to give people an opportunity to
> object?
>
> If the latter, I believe it should be pretty easy for the chairs to say:
> "We've renamed the 'spam' parameter to 'confidence', and made some other
> minor editorial improvements. Interested parties should comment on the list
> if they object." It's up to the chairs whether they want to couple this
> request with a WGLC.
>
> /a
>
> *From: *Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
> *Subject: **draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-02.txt*
> *Date: *October 30, 2017 at 11:08:36 PM EDT
> *To: *sipcore-chairs@ietf.org, Stir Chairs <stir-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
> *Resent-From: *<alias-bounces@ietf.org>
> *Resent-From: *wg-alias-bounces@tools.ietf.org
> *Resent-To: *housley@vigilsec.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com
> *Resent-To: *stir-chairs@ietf.org
>
> Brian & Jean:
>
> I submitted draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-02.txt, which addresses
> comments I have received.
>
> I will be in Singapore, but an obligation related to a grant proposal
> makes me arrive Wednesday morning. If there was a need to discuss the
> draft, I had kind of hoped that we could move any draft discussion to
> STIR, since that seemed topically close and since it was meeting late
> in the week as of the time when I booked my flight, but that option is
> apparently gone. (I know that session scheduling is tough given the
> various constraints, so I'm not complaining.)
>
> In any event, I'd like to figure out how to wrap up the draft since
> discussion seems to have died down.
>
> Henning
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>
>
>