[sipcore] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-05: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-locparam/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. I found the document easy to
read even for a non SIP-fluent person like me.

I have just one non-blocking comment/question. Your reply will be appreciated.

-- Section 7 --
If the source of location is critical, then I wonder why this source is not
cryptographically authenticated... Having hop-by-hop TLS protection is not
enough probably as the UE (or any adverse proxy on the path) could insert a
fake Geoloc with a fake loc-src.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric