Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-10: question and comment

Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> Thu, 11 October 2012 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <brett@broadsoft.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9339521F85A0 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCzew0RmLmqt for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout01.partnerhosted.com (smtpout01.partnerhosted.com [173.225.22.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272A021F859C for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CASUMHUB03.citservers.local (172.16.98.219) by Xedge02.citservers.local (172.16.98.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:05:35 -0700
Received: from MBX06.citservers.local ([fe80::bc79:c816:92ac:db09]) by CASUMHUB03.citservers.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:05:35 -0700
From: Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com>
To: Dale R Worley <worley@TheWorld.com>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-10: question and comment
Thread-Index: AQHNpy6uRRkszvr5Uky74jsJGv/yXJez364A
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:05:33 +0000
Message-ID: <576A8B541C219D4E9CEB1DF8C19C7B880166EE@MBX06.citservers.local>
References: <201210102052.q9AKqTRe4347897@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <201210102052.q9AKqTRe4347897@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.16.98.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sipcore] draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-10: question and comment
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 10:05:35 -0000

> > Based upon sections 6.1 and 9.2, it looks like the 
> > UAC MUST include History-Info within the initial INVITE.
> 
> That's true.  It is a change from earlier versions.
> 
> > However since section 5.1 and some (not all) 
> > draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-callflows-01
> > examples do not include it, I thought that I'd ask.
> 
> Well, section 5.1 is "Acknowledgements".

The section 5.1 reference/comment was for draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-10 section 5.1.

Thanks for the response,
Brett