[sipcore] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-08: (with COMMENT)
Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 12 June 2019 17:06 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D56120089; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected@ietf.org, Jean Mahoney <mahoney@nostrum.com>, sipcore-chairs@ietf.org, mahoney@nostrum.com, sipcore@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.97.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <156035921069.14103.10047256808594559317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:06:50 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/R-FHv2GTrtEcCYWIW380xemhjz8>
Subject: [sipcore] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 17:06:51 -0000
Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected-08: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-rejected/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I generally approach SIP documents with a sense of foreboding — they are often long, expect a large amount of knowledge outside my area of expertise, and require lots of reference chasing — but this was a really good read. It describes the problem well, it lays out the protocol clearly, and contains enough humor / snark to make reading it actually enjoyable. Nits: "Another value of the 607 rejection is presuming the proxy forwards the response code to the User Agent Client (UAC), the calling UAC or intervening proxies will also learn the user is not interested in receiving calls from that sender." I found this sentence really hard to parse -- I think adding a comma after "is" fixes it. "An algorithm can be vulnerable to an algorithm subject to the base rate fallacy [BaseRate] rejecting the call." Unparsable -- duplication? Perhaps just " An algorithm can be vulnerable to the base rate fallacy [BaseRate] rejecting the call."?
- [sipcore] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-sipco… Warren Kumari via Datatracker
- Re: [sipcore] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-s… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Warren Kumari's Yes on draft-ietf-s… Eric Burger