Re: [sipcore] Draft new version: draft-holmberg-sipcore-proxy-feature

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Thu, 27 January 2011 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A7F3A699E for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:54:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A9KzM2oXa2ay for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E413A69AB for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 09:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAH9AQU1AZnwM/2dsb2JhbACkfXOgY5tPhU8EhReHEINE
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2011 17:57:32 +0000
Received: from [10.86.250.39] (bxb-vpn3-551.cisco.com [10.86.250.39]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0RHvWuG020840; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:57:32 GMT
Message-ID: <4D41B20C.5030506@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:57:32 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058502B84084@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <BDBFB6CE314EDF4CB80404CACAEFF5DE07C6C68C@XCH02DFW.rim.net>, <4D3A2C3D.10508@cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585194414F717@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4D3EEC64.2080302@nostrum.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05851944155A13@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4D3F2365.2070504@nostrum.com> <580BEA5E3B99744AB1F5BFF5E9A3C67DFA9550FF@HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <4D405B30.8020503@cisco.com> <580BEA5E3B99744AB1F5BFF5E9A3C67DFAAEA1E2@HE111648.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <4D419056.8080502@nostrum.com> <4D4199EB.5050705@cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585194427B1AA@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <4D41AA37.1060009@cisco.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585194427B1D3@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585194427B1D3@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>, "R.Jesske@telekom.de" <R.Jesske@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Draft new version: draft-holmberg-sipcore-proxy-feature
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:54:30 -0000

On 1/27/2011 12:26 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> IMO the key differences are:
>>
>> - the definition must be publicly available
>> - capabilities/feature-tags should be orthogonal
>>
>> (And of course it is impossible to verify orthogonality
>> without the definitions being available.)
>
> As far as I know, all 3GPP specifications are publicly available.

I wasn't trying to imply that they are not, just putting a stake in the 
ground generally.

The orthogonality also ties into the quote Adam cited. I had forgotten 
exactly how that was stated. It goes further.

	Thanks,
	Paul