[sipcore] Status of comments on RFC 4244bis WGLC

"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com> Fri, 29 October 2010 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DC83A6940 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NYVbRbcI72q5 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms01.m0019.fra.mmp.de.bt.com (m0019.fra.mmp.de.bt.com [62.180.227.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BAC3A6810 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 04:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmx12-mx ([62.134.46.10] [62.134.46.10]) by ms01.m0020.fra.mmp.de.bt.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-2108369; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:38 +0200
Received: from MCHP064A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.63]) by senmx12-mx (Server) with ESMTP id CB51E23F028E; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by MCHP064A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.63]) with mapi; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:38 +0200
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: "Barnes, Mary" <Mary.Barnes@Polycom.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:36 +0200
Thread-Topic: Status of comments on RFC 4244bis WGLC
Thread-Index: Act3WTcP8HcYm8DcQpS64WX+M0v19w==
Message-ID: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA023313F687@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: [sipcore] Status of comments on RFC 4244bis WGLC
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:03:48 -0000

Mary,

I don't recall seeing a response to my WGLC comments:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg03238.html

The diffs from 01 to 02 are quite extensive, so some of the text concerned has disappeared or been changed for other reasons, so I will need to read the entire document again to see whether some of my concerns are addressed. However, I noticed that at least some of my minor/editorial concerns appeared not to have been addressed, which made me wonder whether my comments had been lost in the noise. I would appreciate feedback on any comments you were unable to deal with.

Thanks,

John