[sipcore] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-04: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 01 October 2019 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B557512083F; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 07:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam@ietf.org, Brian Rosen <br@brianrosen.net>, sipcore-chairs@ietf.org, br@brianrosen.net, sipcore@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.103.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156993854073.23764.6952952932730939348.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 07:02:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/ZMGZWcLwTKHCyIIKk3Hkn8zT-fI>
Subject: [sipcore] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:02:31 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-callinfo-spam/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Section 1. Per the reference to “the historical precedent of the ‘blue pages’”, is that a references understandable outside of the US/Canada? Section 1. Per “In the United States, industry organizations have proposed …”, is there a citation for this activity? Section 4. Typo. s/equipement/equipment/ Section 8.1. ‘Confidence’ appears to be missing from the list of new parameters to register in "Header Field Parameters and Parameter Values" under “Call-Info”. Section 8.3. Per idnits, RFC 5226 is obsoleted by RFC 8126 Section 9. Per “Thus, a UAS SHOULD NOT trust the information … unless … the UAS is protected by TLS [RFC8446]”, is this text explicitly saying only TLS v1.3 is trusted (i.e., TLS v1.2 or a future TLS v2 would not be trusted)? I’d recommend indicating a TLS version number (e.g., TLS 1.2+ or per RFC7525) Section 9. Nit. /the called party is mislead/the called party is misled/
- [sipcore] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker