IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Updates to 4244bis-05

Shida Schubert <shida@agnada.com> Sun, 10 July 2011 07:08 UTC

Return-Path: <shida@agnada.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9394421F8A97 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIlsSm3dv7qX for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway12.websitewelcome.com (gateway12.websitewelcome.com [67.18.15.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DCE4721F8ACC for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21185 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2011 07:06:09 -0000
Received: from gator465.hostgator.com (69.56.174.130) by gateway12.websitewelcome.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2011 07:06:09 -0000
Received: from flh1ade252.tky.mesh.ad.jp ([220.102.214.252]:49693 helo=[192.168.11.10]) by gator465.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <shida@agnada.com>) id 1Qfo8J-00042p-AP; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 02:08:51 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Shida Schubert <shida@agnada.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F56DD@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:08:49 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D8F12201-3914-41AD-A257-13BC8A722FB7@agnada.com>
References: <BANLkTi=-rZ1j6RwzMYATeo2WkqksdoV6ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F56DD@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator465.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - agnada.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: flh1ade252.tky.mesh.ad.jp ([192.168.11.10]) [220.102.214.252]:49693
X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQ2NS5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Cc: SIPCORE Chairs <sipcore-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Updates to 4244bis-05
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 07:08:53 -0000

Hi Dale;

 It's not for backward compatibility.

 We couldn't come up with reason why reason should 
be included in case of 2xx responses.

 Mary presented the proposed changes at the last 
meeting and people agreed to the changes.

 Can you think of a good reason why we should revert 
the changes, if so please let us know.

 Regards
  Shida 

On Jun 23, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:

> ________________________________________
> From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mary Barnes [mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com]
> 
> 2) Updated section 9.3 (receiving responses) to also include timeouts and updated to reflect that we don't add the Reason header in the case of 2xx responses.
> ________________________________________
> 
> Can you tell me the design considerations for why Reason is not used in the case of 2xx responses?  (Is it for backward compatibility?)
> 
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email