Re: [sipcore] I-DAction:draft-mohali-sipcore-reason-extension-application-01

<marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com> Thu, 17 March 2011 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B503A6A59 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:38:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7pquyhjefBr2 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CFA3A69BE for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FAD06F8007; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:40:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EED6C0002; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:40:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:40:11 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:40:10 +0100
Message-ID: <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F5776A5945@ftrdmel1>
In-Reply-To: <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F5776A5936@ftrdmel1>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [sipcore]I-DAction:draft-mohali-sipcore-reason-extension-application-01
Thread-Index: AcvZyONLW9FOvLuUTUqkYcckL0it7wDKxr0yAFSpeNAAEGYxoAGIbH+gAAXa6LA=
References: <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F5775D36A6@ftrdmel1><4D6C2CB6.4040800@cisco.com><B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F577617DBB@ftrdmel1>, <4D6FD03A.8040507@cisco.com><CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B220B5C154B@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>, <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F57765B3A4@ftrdmel1><CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B220B5C1567@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <B11765B89737A7498AF63EA84EC9F5776A5936@ftrdmel1>
From: marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com
To: dworley@avaya.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Mar 2011 16:40:11.0318 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBB86D60:01CBE4C1]
Cc: sipcore@ietf.org, Christer.Holmberg@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [sipcore] I-DAction:draft-mohali-sipcore-reason-extension-application-01
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:38:45 -0000

Oups, to following my example, 
F3 flow should be a 200 OK (to Alice)
And F4 would be a BYE from the Toll Free Directory to Alice (Alice is a prepaid card caller so it would not be proposed a connection to the Restaurant).  

Sorry

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : sipcore-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de 
> marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com
> Envoyé : jeudi 17 mars 2011 17:31
> À : dworley@avaya.com; pkyzivat@cisco.com
> Cc : sipcore@ietf.org; Christer.Holmberg@ericsson.com
> Objet : Re: 
> [sipcore]I-DAction:draft-mohali-sipcore-reason-extension-appli
> cation-01
> 
> 
> Hi Dale,
> 
> Here is a simple call flow to illustrate the example 
> mentioned in my email (you can see 2 more examples in the I-D 
> with Reason header inside History-Info header or NOT):
> 
> Alice calls a Toll Free Directory service to retreive a 
> restaurant phone number in Prague. 
> She is calling from a public phone using her Prepaid card.
> 
>      Alice      Prepaid service  Toll Free Directory    Restaurant
>        |                |                 |                 |
>        |    INVITE F1   |                 |                 |
>        |--------------->|   INVITE F2     |                 |
>        |                |---------------->|                 |
>        |                |                 |    INVITE F3    |
>        |                |                 |---------------->|  
> 
> F1: INVITE Alice -> Prepaid
> 
> INVITE sip:+18005555555@prepaid.com;user=phone SIP/2.0
> From: Alice <sip:alice@example.com>; tag=1234567
> To: Prepaid service <sip:info@prepaid.biloxie.com>
> Supported: histinfo
> ...
> 
> F2: INVITE Prepaid -> Toll Free Directory
> 
> INVITE sip:+18005551212@phone2net.com SIP/2.0
> From: Alice <sip:alice@example.com>; tag=1234567
> To: sip:+18005551212@phone2net.com;user=phone
> Supported: histinfo
> History-Info: 
> <sip:+18005555555@example.com;user=phone?Reason=application
>               %3Bcause%3D9%3B text%3D "Prepaid">;index=1
>               <sip:+18005551212@phone2net.com>;index=1.1;mp=1
> ...
>  
> F3: INVITE Toll Free Directory -> Restaurant
> 
> INVITE sip:+420224841111@prague.com SIP/2.0
> From: Alice <sip:alice@example.com>; tag=1234567
> To: sip:+420224841111@prague.com;user=phone
> Supported: histinfo
> History-Info: 
> <sip:+18005555555@prepaid.com;user=phone?Reason=application
>               %3Bcause%3D9%3B text%3D "Prepaid">;index=1,
>               <sip:+18005551212@phone2net.com?Reason=application
>               %3Bcause%3D11%3B text%3D "Toll Free">;index=1.1;mp=1,
> 		  <sip:+420224841111@prague.com>index=1.1.1
> ...
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Marianne
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Worley, Dale R (Dale) [mailto:dworley@avaya.com] Envoyé : 
> > mercredi 9 mars 2011 19:32 À : MOHALI Marianne RD-CORE-ISS; 
> > pkyzivat@cisco.com Cc : sipcore@ietf.org; 
> > Christer.Holmberg@ericsson.com Objet : RE: [sipcore]
> > I-DAction:draft-mohali-sipcore-reason-extension-application-01
> > 
> > ________________________________________
> > From: marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com
> > [marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com]
> > 
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De : Worley, Dale R (Dale) [mailto:dworley@avaya.com]
> > >
> > > Could we see an example of how this is expected to be done?
> > > (Or have I overlooked the example?)  There are various
> > subtlties in a
> > > protocol feature whose *absence* in the signaling tells another 
> > > application that a certain action may be taken.
> > 
> > [MM] In my network, I have an agreement with the Prepaid 
> application 
> > that is to identify itself in the signaling (in the H-I 
> header) when 
> > applied.
> > So that, I can offer to all of my clients a customized 
> service with a 
> > connection to the reseached phone number except for prepaid callers.
> > Callers from other networks will not be able to enjoy the 
> customized 
> > service (with the connection) as they are considered as untrusted.
> > _______________________________________
> > 
> > I was thinking of a call flow, showing the critical header 
> fields, the 
> > various proxies involved, etc.
> > 
> > Dale
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>