Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis

Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 25 August 2010 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3693A6B4F for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9c6S8vRGpMvC for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846403A69F1 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so342482gyh.31 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NhVpOOsNnleuUWLDLbpNd/+x0+DktOA4YB3xeh/M5kQ=; b=pmuRZVzpIEYlBj140f9CF8GBlXZCLX2oDe6ZRJ/WpT0vDtJtei95rmr/sC/RIW3WV4 ot1md4ZRq1L4dctoC5BCqrQsgrowq3hdJPAfwe/+YFEYW7HY/u6ITjQr7Pu8gl5Tf5wG dt323IRBCzbe4wSCseVOh1ixtNvSXazS70BnE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=q2M95NT8MlnVEFgKkdkupdebvyFXvszCtHhDgaKRCCv41q5zW42l4He8E3h5Ra7ilC Yvr99iQ0enNKi0ianUwRojAKS4Tv6uaAXegIrtL41y4h6f/8ET4e/p3jrBjV1TYbhKeu IW3v4eGlI1aipstDjbSmrBNeyBCdkYdt8iTW0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.122.15 with SMTP id u15mr9535543anc.98.1282755675220; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.169.14 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimBgKC_eZo1FGQWk-vYOTPRzgVZ7opGTj1h_0Zo@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C69ADA8.1010802@nostrum.com> <4C753AAA.3030407@nostrum.com> <4C754893.4080202@cisco.com> <AANLkTimBgKC_eZo1FGQWk-vYOTPRzgVZ7opGTj1h_0Zo@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:01:15 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTik4_bNqiTLtJYxKcqbuiD=MuXY3opuuNahgqmjL@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e644df525b03cd048ea8d43f
Cc: "SIPCORE \(Session Initiation Protocol Core\) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:00:48 -0000

Actually, I did respond to that message, per the following:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg03088.html

(threading in the email archives is no better than my archiving method for
emails).

Thanks,
Mary.

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> Sorry, I should have replied to that thread, but I didn't think there was a
> change necessary.  I'll reply now.
>
> Mary.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> [as individual]
>>
>> There was some discussion on the -00 version back in July that was not,
>> AFAICT, addressed in the -01 version. There is a thread emanating from
>> mary's announcement of the -00 version. The following is a hook into that
>> thread:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg03056.html
>>
>> It has to do with when privacy should be applied.
>>
>>        Thanks,
>>        Paul
>>
>>
>> Adam Roach wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  [as chair]
>>>
>>> As a reminder, we're just over halfway through this WGLC, and have not
>>> yet seen any comments. Please take some time to review this draft.
>>>
>>> /a
>>>
>>> On 8/16/10 4:29 PM, Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> [as chair]
>>>>
>>>> A major author of draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-01 believes that the
>>>> document has no remaining open issues, and is ready for evaluation. Today,
>>>> we are starting a two-week working group last call period. This last call
>>>> period ends on Tuesday, August 31st.
>>>>
>>>> The latest version of the document can be retrieved here:
>>>>
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis
>>>>
>>>> Any comments on the document should be sent to the SIPCORE mailing list.
>>>>
>>>> /a
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sipcore mailing list
>>>> sipcore@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipcore mailing list
>>> sipcore@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>> sipcore mailing list
>> sipcore@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>>
>
>