Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 25 August 2010 17:00 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3693A6B4F for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9c6S8vRGpMvC for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846403A69F1 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:00:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so342482gyh.31 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NhVpOOsNnleuUWLDLbpNd/+x0+DktOA4YB3xeh/M5kQ=; b=pmuRZVzpIEYlBj140f9CF8GBlXZCLX2oDe6ZRJ/WpT0vDtJtei95rmr/sC/RIW3WV4 ot1md4ZRq1L4dctoC5BCqrQsgrowq3hdJPAfwe/+YFEYW7HY/u6ITjQr7Pu8gl5Tf5wG dt323IRBCzbe4wSCseVOh1ixtNvSXazS70BnE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=q2M95NT8MlnVEFgKkdkupdebvyFXvszCtHhDgaKRCCv41q5zW42l4He8E3h5Ra7ilC Yvr99iQ0enNKi0ianUwRojAKS4Tv6uaAXegIrtL41y4h6f/8ET4e/p3jrBjV1TYbhKeu IW3v4eGlI1aipstDjbSmrBNeyBCdkYdt8iTW0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.122.15 with SMTP id u15mr9535543anc.98.1282755675220; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.169.14 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:01:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimBgKC_eZo1FGQWk-vYOTPRzgVZ7opGTj1h_0Zo@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4C69ADA8.1010802@nostrum.com> <4C753AAA.3030407@nostrum.com> <4C754893.4080202@cisco.com> <AANLkTimBgKC_eZo1FGQWk-vYOTPRzgVZ7opGTj1h_0Zo@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:01:15 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTik4_bNqiTLtJYxKcqbuiD=MuXY3opuuNahgqmjL@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e644df525b03cd048ea8d43f"
Cc: "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:00:48 -0000
Actually, I did respond to that message, per the following: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg03088.html (threading in the email archives is no better than my archiving method for emails). Thanks, Mary. On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>wrote: > Sorry, I should have replied to that thread, but I didn't think there was a > change necessary. I'll reply now. > > Mary. > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> wrote: > >> [as individual] >> >> There was some discussion on the -00 version back in July that was not, >> AFAICT, addressed in the -01 version. There is a thread emanating from >> mary's announcement of the -00 version. The following is a hook into that >> thread: >> >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg03056.html >> >> It has to do with when privacy should be applied. >> >> Thanks, >> Paul >> >> >> Adam Roach wrote: >> >>> >>> [as chair] >>> >>> As a reminder, we're just over halfway through this WGLC, and have not >>> yet seen any comments. Please take some time to review this draft. >>> >>> /a >>> >>> On 8/16/10 4:29 PM, Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> [as chair] >>>> >>>> A major author of draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-01 believes that the >>>> document has no remaining open issues, and is ready for evaluation. Today, >>>> we are starting a two-week working group last call period. This last call >>>> period ends on Tuesday, August 31st. >>>> >>>> The latest version of the document can be retrieved here: >>>> >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis >>>> >>>> Any comments on the document should be sent to the SIPCORE mailing list. >>>> >>>> /a >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sipcore mailing list >>>> sipcore@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipcore mailing list >>> sipcore@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> sipcore mailing list >> sipcore@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore >> > >
- [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Paul Kyzivat
- [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Elwell, John
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Elwell, John
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Mary Barnes
- Re: [sipcore] H-I in 100 response (was REMINDER: … Elwell, John
- Re: [sipcore] H-I in 100 response (was REMINDER: … Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] H-I in 100 response (was REMINDER: … DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [sipcore] H-I in 100 response (was REMINDER: … Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipc… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] H-I in 100 response (was REMINDER: … Victor Pascual Avila
- [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Christer Holmberg
- [sipcore] 4244bis-05: editorial comments Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [sipcore] 4244bis-05: editorial comments Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Christer Holmberg
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Andrew Allen
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Cullen Jennings
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Andrew Allen
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis Shida Schubert