IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU into its UA Contact marked?

Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> Tue, 07 September 2010 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7433A6A29 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FkMXe9H1dOuC for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway05.websitewelcome.com (gateway05.websitewelcome.com [69.93.35.13]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D6D93A67FF for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 32277 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2010 13:26:08 -0000
Received: from gator465.hostgator.com (69.56.174.130) by gateway05.websitewelcome.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2010 13:26:08 -0000
Received: from [60.236.84.106] (port=51230 helo=[192.168.1.2]) by gator465.hostgator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <shida@ntt-at.com>) id 1OsyBZ-0005sg-P7; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:26:06 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79C19@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:26:05 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <54579397-D4DC-4043-8D42-7E6F357E5F6F@ntt-at.com>
References: <061.f3e7a20653cdf403663b0bffba4c43b4@tools.ietf.org>, <DF18BFD3-F136-4BC0-81B1-D16DA4657951@ntt-at.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79C09@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com> <35ECC1DD-6DD6-4103-AC47-A2F9A0D69DAD@ntt-at.com> <4C80EF97.4090703@cisco.com>, <2E92FEF2-DCBD-44A9-869B-CCE2BB98278F@ntt-at.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FFC79C19@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator465.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] #38: How is the mapping of a GRUU into its UA Contact marked?
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:25:41 -0000

 I guess we could but is it really necessary when 
"gr" tag is present for GRUU?

 Shida

On Sep 4, 2010, at 12:14 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:

> ________________________________________
> From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shida Schubert [shida@ntt-at.com]
> 
> I too think it's cleaner to leave GRUU out of tagging.
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Perhaps we should define a tag for "GRUU resolution".  That seems to be a distinct case whose meaning will be stable for a long time.
> 
> Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email