Re: [sipcore] REMINDER: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis

Sorry, I should have replied to that thread, but I didn't think there was a
change necessary.  I'll reply now.

Mary.

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> wrote:

> [as individual]
>
> There was some discussion on the -00 version back in July that was not,
> AFAICT, addressed in the -01 version. There is a thread emanating from
> mary's announcement of the -00 version. The following is a hook into that
> thread:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg03056.html
>
> It has to do with when privacy should be applied.
>
>        Thanks,
>        Paul
>
>
> Adam Roach wrote:
>
>>
>>  [as chair]
>>
>> As a reminder, we're just over halfway through this WGLC, and have not yet
>> seen any comments. Please take some time to review this draft.
>>
>> /a
>>
>> On 8/16/10 4:29 PM, Adam Roach - SIPCORE Chair wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [as chair]
>>>
>>> A major author of draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis-01 believes that the
>>> document has no remaining open issues, and is ready for evaluation. Today,
>>> we are starting a two-week working group last call period. This last call
>>> period ends on Tuesday, August 31st.
>>>
>>> The latest version of the document can be retrieved here:
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-rfc4244bis
>>>
>>> Any comments on the document should be sent to the SIPCORE mailing list.
>>>
>>> /a
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sipcore mailing list
>>> sipcore@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipcore mailing list
>> sipcore@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>