[sipcore] draft-worley-service-example-03

"Rifaat Shekh-Yusef" <rifatyu@nortel.com> Tue, 07 July 2009 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <RIFATYU@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B313A6A18 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jh+Jkzm-jzGM for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAA33A682B for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 13:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com []) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n67KVV119584 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 20:31:32 GMT
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9FF42.226DC908"
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 16:33:06 -0400
Message-ID: <B6283042895A6E4CA514737785984B35129CFEEC@zcarhxm0.corp.nortel.com>
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] draft-worley-service-example-03
Thread-Index: Acn/QiH7WIGKBpV6QVW13R14ik1qmg==
From: "Rifaat Shekh-Yusef" <rifatyu@nortel.com>
To: <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: [sipcore] draft-worley-service-example-03
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:35:03 -0000


I think that you need to add more information about the interaction with
Session Timers.

For example, what is the expected behavior:

1. If Alice is the refresher: Is Alice expected to become the refresher
for the new session with the music server?
2. If Bob is the refresher: Is the music server expected to become the
new refresher?

I am assuming that Bob is expected to keep forwarding the Session Timers
RE-INVITEs/UPDATEs between Alice and the music server. Correct?